Translate

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Is Sweden the next country to be targeted by ISIS? And why so.


Now I wonder if Sweden is going to get pulled into conflict with ISIS, as that the Charlie Hebdo attacks happened after France voted to recognise Palestine as a state (https://duckduckgo.com//?q=France+Palestine+statehood), and after Japan is about to send $100,000,000 to rebuild Gaza (https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Japan+rebuild+Gaza), 2 Japanese guys were taken hostage (albeit probably faked; look at https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ISIS+hostage+hoax). Also, the 2011 Norway attacks happened under suspicious circumstances (watch Norwegian attack, three targets one lone nut? I doubt it).

For some more background info, I suggest looking at https://www.youtube.com/user/Rys2sense/search?query=Paris, Charlie Hebdo - The Hidden Agenda Exposed, The Paris Attacks Are Just The Beginning, and do some research on the association between ISIS/ISIL and the Israeli government (https://www.youtube.com/user/Rys2sense/search?query=ISIS+Israel, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Israel+ISIS, https://duckduckgo.com//?q=ISIS+Israel).

Not to mention claims that Sweden has high rates of rape, which is blamed on Muslims, Arabs and North Africans (while it is not entirely unfounded, I do question it. It is possible that it is not that rape itself is going up, but rather, the amount of cases being reported more often). So, if ISIS attacks, the tensions would become even worse, and instead of loosening restrictions on civilian weapon ownership, training people in self-defense and kicking out (ie deporting) troublemakers, collective punishment on Muslims, Arabs and North Africans would be more called on and deemed more acceptable.

I'm NOT saying that this will happen, but it may happen. I don't know if an inquiry is enough to provoke an attack, but I am just making a guess.

If this comes true, please credit me for "predicting" this!

Now, do you agree, disagree, or want to add more? Please say so in the comments!

Thank you for reading this article. Please follow me on Pinterest (https://www.pinterest.com/StopDemocide/), Google+ (https://plus.google.com/116561475917836019721/posts), and subscribe to my YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClWR5zBdxxnFGQ_kPFUDLkg/about), and please support the channels I support.

Sunday, January 10, 2016

How the powers that be are damaging decent countries, & keeping Africa, Central, & south America & parts of Asia poor

Ever thought of why places like Africa and Central and South America are so poor? Do you ever notice how influential people are encouraging immigration to developed countries, particularly to Europe, North America, New Zealand and Australia, but not, say, Israel (except for Jews, NOT that I hate or blame them all)? And do you ever notice how the media is trying to divide average people by race or religion?

There is proof that all are true.


As explained in the video above, the powers that be are, for quite a few reasons, are keeping Africa poor on pourpose. Also, you can look up how NAFTA is hurting Mexico's economy and how the failed drug war is hurting the economy of Central and South America.

When it comes to immigration to developed countries except for Israel, it is true that it is not always done properly. Watch How Zionists Divide and Conquer for more info. I also recommend reading "Immigration: what I think".

When it comes to the media race-baiting and faith-baiting, this is definitely true. Look at the following links for details; 
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkYQwSCzfVRGI5C1_mCLhfvWAaVRQBe-Z https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkYQwSCzfVRFKh7KNYFSvK8AMcoKNbPdV.

Putting 2 and 2 together, we can see that, in conclusion, the powers that be are keeping Africa poor and creating conflict on purpose, which forces the people living there to go and move to more stable and better developed places just to live a better and at least a somewhat easy or decent life. A similar case is seen with NAFTA where Mexico couldn't create tariffs to protect their own economy, and when combined with cost of the drug war, corruption, big corporations exploiting average people and strict weapon laws keeping most legal weapons that are practical for fighting out of the hands of civilians, Mexicans are forced to go to the United States of America in search of better sources of income and a better life for their families. 

The immigration to North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand, especially when some of the immigrants are misbehaving, is an enormous catalyst for anti-immigrant and anti-immigration sentiment. To make matters even worse, many of the immigrants don't have many too many good options as to where they are going to go. And the developed countries I described only have so much room. Thus, the manipulators are NOT just screwing white, black, or brown people; they're screwing ALL average people.

However, this does not need to happen; if financial institutions and mega corporations would quit ripping off Africa, it should not take long before its economy would get better. A similar situation would happen if we ended NAFTA and lightened regulations for drugs to the extent that criminals would lose their source of income, and thus, much of the violence would decrease very quickly, and the economy of South and Central America would get better.
Not to mention that many immigrants would go back to their home countries, reducing cultural conflict, taking out a major catalyst for ethnic/racial and cultural/religious tension.

What are your thoughts of this? Any questions, concerns, or things I've missed? Please say so in the comments!
Now, I would prefer it if you would try to keep your comment as clean, and tasteful as possible (no hatred or racism), or it won't see the light of day.

Also watch: Japan superior immigration policies?.

Thank you for reading this article. Please follow me on Pinterest (https://www.pinterest.com/StopDemocide/), Google+ (https://plus.google.com/116561475917836019721/posts), and subscribe to my YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClWR5zBdxxnFGQ_kPFUDLkg/about), and please support the channels I support.

Thursday, January 7, 2016

Did Alex Jones & Infowars finally blow it?

Now, I have lost more of my support for Alex Jones than I ever did before. This is more than for the reasons explained on https://www.youtube.com/user/Rys2sense/search?query=Alex+Jones, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22David+Duke%22+%22Alex+Jones%22, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%22Michael+Collins+Piper%22+%22Alex+Jones%22, searches of "Alex Jones exposed", "Alex Jones Zionist" or things like that, but the content that he has been putting out since November or December of 2015, which I feel has dropped in quality, and now is ideology-baiting against Muslims. Along with that, as mentioned on YouTube Still Monetizes Alex Jones Videos BUT NOT Representative Press Videos?!, even though YouTube/Google is de-monetising content with dissenting political views or addresses topics in ways that whoever is in power don't want, I haven't seen Infowars report on this!

I don't have much more to say.

Now, which other truth people should we listen to? I suggest starting on https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClWR5zBdxxnFGQ_kPFUDLkg/channels?view=60.

Monday, January 4, 2016

Why I think the oldest American civil war veterans saw some of the most change in history

When thinking about our ancestors, have you wondered who saw the most change in history so far, and specifically, what are some of those changes? Here's my reasons for believing that some of the last surviving veterans of the American civil war saw, at least argueably, the most changes in our history, and it hinges on 5 main technological factors, along with an historical-political factor, not really in a particular order.

.Firearms. These people were born in a time when single-shot muzzleloading muskets and cap-and-ball revolvers were still in common use despite the rise of cartridge-loaded firearms and reliable repeaters. A few lived until the time that semi-automatic rifles such as the M1 Garand (and its many variants) and SVT-38/40 were just replacing manual-action, mainly bolt-action rifles, and were cheap enough, simple enough, reliable and overall, practical to have as standard issue to large military forces, and when we start to see practical, built from the ground up intermediate-caliber assault rifles such as the MKB-42, and the more common Sturmgewehr 43/44 and AK-47 (albeit the AK-47 wasn't common yet, and the Soviets kept quite about it until the Vietnam war) rifles come into service and be practical as opposed to earlier, less successful attempts to make assault rifles such as the Cei-Rigotti and Fedorov-Avtomat.
At the same time, the cap-and-ball revolvers I mentioned were replaced by cartridge loading revolvers, and later, semi-automatic pistols. The best pistol that a civil war veteran would live to see was the Browning Hi-Power, which is a bit dated but still decent and used handgun by today's standards.
Also at the same time, they would also see practical handheld automatic weapons, such as the Madsen machine gun, Villar-Perosa, the MP-18, Thompson submachinegun, and Browning Automatic Rifle come in, which are all automatic weapons that are compact and lightweight enough to be carried, fired and reloaded by 1 person without the help of anyone else, along with man-portable belt-fed machine guns such as the MG 08/15 and MG-42.
Before I round this up, I didn't forget smokeless powder, jacketed bullets and bottlenecked cartridges!
Interestingly enough, the 2 last Confederate veterans lived up until 1959. So, they just might've seen the AR-10, a weapon that is, technologically and literally, about a century ahead of the weapons they used during the civil war.

.Medical advances. You can read up on how during the civil war era, more people actually died from contagious diseases than directly in battle! During World War 2, we had working antibiotics such as penicillin and other medicines that really helped combat disease. During the civil war era, people didn't wash hands or medical equipment that often. So, a surgeon or doctor could drop a tool such as a bonesaw on the ground and do little to nothing to really clean it! But, by the World War 2 era, people regularly washed hands, clean medical equipment, and tried to keep areas where medical work was being done cleaner. Not to mention how blood transfusions existed at least from latter half of the 17th century, but didn't become commonplace until the early 20th century, which was the time when people figured out how to do it safely becuase giving someone the wrong blood type is actually very risky!

.Transportation. Back during the American civil war era, people often had to ride on animal-drawn wagons or ride in trains with manual mechanical brakes, wooden cars heated by coal, pulled by 4-4-0 American style locomotives riding on iron tracks. But, by World War 2, trains had more sturdy steel cars that were heated by steam, reliable engineer-controlled air/vacuum brake systems, and were now more often pulled by diesel locomotives riding on steel tracks. At the same time, average people can afford decent cars, and airplanes started to take over and helicopters and jets started to appear.

.Ship technology and design. Even though steam powered ironclads were did exist during the civil war era, wooden sailing ships were still common. After the turn of the 20th century, steel steam-powered ships were in very common use, and diesel-powered submarines were in use during World War 1.

.Communication. During the American civil war era, news was spread through word-of-mouth, newspapers and telegraph. After World War 1, it was spread by radio and television started to become common, and after World War 2, television became quite popular.

.Political history. Oh my goodness is this enormous! I encorage looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/19th_century from the 1850's onwards, and up untill the 1950's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20th_century. I'm sorry, but this part is far too big for me to be willing talk about now.

With all of this being seen by these people, please, think about all of the change that has happened; you lived through a period of the rise and fall of dozens of countries. You saw how radically Europe is changing.
Yesterday, you hear about Europe and the United States annexing places in Africa and Asia. Today, you're hearing about those exact places winning a pinch of freedom.
Yesterday, you rode a horse that not everyone privately owned. Today, you ride a car that most people in your country can afford.
Yesterday, you rode a train that had manual mechanical brakes, wooden cars heated by coal, pulled by a steam locomotive and rode on iron tracks. Today, you're riding on a train with working air brakes (vacuum, if you're in other places such as the U.K.), sturdy steel cars probably heated by kerosene, pulled by a diesel locomotive and riding on steel rails.
Yesterday, if you had an infection, you were in fear for your life. Today, if you had an injection, a dose of medicine would probably stop it. Yesterday, you almost never washed your hands.
Today, you wash your hands on a daily basis.
Yesterday, if you wanted to get news, you had to find it through word of mouth and/or a newspaper. Today, you can simply turn on a radio or TV.
Yesterday, if you wanted water, you had to go to a well or manual pump to get it. To heat it, you must put it over a fire. Today, you can turn on a faucet and electric motors and automatic heating systems do that for you.
Yesterday, you shot a rifled musket that was single-shot and loaded from the muzzle. Today, you can shoot a rifle made out of a mixture of steel and aluminum, and had a plastic forend, pistol grip and buttsock, and can fire 1 round per trigger pull, or with a flick of a switch, bursts and up to full magazines.
Yesterday, you fought in a war where brother killed brother and neighbor fought neighbor over state's rights. Today, you see your countrymen, countrywomen and your descendents unite against some of the most evil people publicly known at the time.
Now do you get what I'm talking about?

So which generation or group of people do you think that saw the most change in history? Please leave it in the comments below!

Sunday, January 3, 2016

Does Guns Across Google stink?

Now, I will NOT mention names here becuase, 1, I do not intend to bully, and 2, this is not intended to be a personal attack, but this definitely is a criticism of the community policies and how those policies are enforced.

This all has started when posting an earlier version of my ultimate argument in early 2015, and I tried to get more people to look at my content, as you can see on https://plus.google.com/u/0/116561475917836019721/posts/ALcgyZVaoUK.
I have tried, tried, and tried to conform to and appease their stupidity https://plus.google.com/u/0/116561475917836019721/posts/5rG5utcWpbm https://plus.google.com/u/0/116561475917836019721/posts/gyZgbnsRgdE https://plus.google.com/u/0/116561475917836019721/posts/GTLhBGUkriz https://plus.google.com/u/0/116561475917836019721/posts/PcTBpfs9udb, https://plus.google.com/u/0/116561475917836019721/posts/GCZywbfHzSM, and last, but not least, https://plus.google.com/u/0/116561475917836019721/posts/CNeca4TbH9U. 

As you can see, I have, for the most part, failed miserably at trying to satisfy these morons. Heck, Lipstick bail-bonds is a whole lot more professional at bail enforcement than GAG rent-a-cops (no offense to real life security guards/officers) with content enforcement! I hope someone who's better comes along and replaces those cop wannabes!

Now, I will admit that there are times that they do anything good, like what you see on https://plus.google.com/u/0/+DirkWillden/posts/6N7cPdBTmU2 and https://plus.google.com/u/0/+ShawnWillden/posts/9zesgKqbows, which I definately appreciate. But, I am trying to remain on topic, and they censor me!

I do not expect to get back on the community anytime soon, and I am almost definitely NOT getting back in after this post.

Now, do you want to boycott them? What other communities should we use? Any other community about the right to keep and bear arms/self defense, weapons, and so on and so forth!

What do you think of Guns Across Google and my situation? Did you have similar issues? Please let me know in the comments!

By the way, I have created the ultimate argument for self-defense and the right to keep and bear arms, which could be found here.

Thank you for reading this article. Please follow me on Pinterest (https://www.pinterest.com/StopDemocide/), Google+ (https://plus.google.com/116561475917836019721/posts), and subscribe to my YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClWR5zBdxxnFGQ_kPFUDLkg/about), and please support the channels I support. Please come back soon! Peace!

Do you like my "Read if you're making assumptions about me" post?