Hello there, fellow human beings! Welcome to my little space on the internet. As you can see here, this is NOT the average usual left or right wing or mainstream media person's blog. In fact, I intend to not only post some of my own views, but more importantly, challenge many of the views of both the left & right, do a little occasional philosophy, promote the truth, truth people, the alternate media, & above all, the values of liberty, peace, & prosperity, in that order.
Why the United Nations do not recognise the right to self defense or to keep & bear arms & armor & allows human rights abuses & interesting facts & an explanation
Warning: divisive issues ahead.
As well all know, the United Nations is often championed and praised as the greatest protector of human rights and greatest helper of the world's people of all time. However, as with anything well championed and praised, there is almost always something negative about it that we don't hear about as often.
Let's take the Israel-Palestine conflict, for example.
Depending on who you listen to, the State of Israel has violated at least 28 resolutions(according to someone who's probably an Israel supporter) and at most, HUNDREDS(the latter source was from 2007, so it's probably dated). Saddam Hussein's Iraq (not that I like Saddam) reportedly violated just 16 (I literally counted that twice to make sure that I got that number right, and this is coming from a probably biased source).
Why is this important? Compare what happened to Iraq (got invaded) to what happened to Israel (nothing, except for verbal condemnation and reportedly still receiving more American foreign aid than Africa).
Tell me what the United Nations is doing about all of this. Show me where in school's history books is this highlighted in. TELL MEE!!! Now how much trust do you have in them now to do anything real? NO! Lookup an article called "The United Nations Exposed: Who Is In Control?" to see who's really in control of the UN. Again, hardly an unbacked conspiracy.
There are historically & factually accurate examples of letting the fox guard the henhouse (or having politicians being told to not mistreat their people & have no one other than themselves or people who are controlled by them enforce the rules). We should NOT solely rely on laws & the legal system: you can read up on how, on paper, people living in places such as the Soviet Union & communist China might've had rights on paper, but not in practice. This is what I mean by letting the fox guard the henhouse: how are we sure that they're not going to break the rules? And how are we sure that if they do break the rules, how do we make sure that they get a sufficient consequence?". Essentially, the United Nations seem to want to keep the world's people "On a short leash".
If the United Nations truly cared about the world's people (which I'm sure it doesn't and only acts like it does for public relations), then it is the most INcompetent organization in history. If a few average individuals can put 2 and 2 together, why can't an international organization with thousands of human members and had a budget in the billions of dollars put 2 and 2 together?