Follow by Email


Saturday, April 16, 2016

Please don't be a Yoda! Try to bring real change, & we CAN bring real change! And was releasing the internet to the general public the biggest mistake the powers that be made?

Now, what do I mean in a "Yoda"? A good person who has given up fighting evil and/or bringing good without becoming evil, often becuase of difficulty of informing others.

This is a reference to what Yoda, from Star Wars, did after the events of "Revenge of the Sith", in which he exiled himself to Dagobah and watched as the Galactic Empire took over the galaxy (
I made this post for the all of the people who gave up or are thinking about giving up becuase of they feel that they can't bring enough real change. This was especially inspired after visiting an uncle of mine recently, who listens to a bunch of truth people (especially the Infowars team). He used to try to teach people the truth like I am now, but, has given up, all becuase too many people didn't want to accept the truth. Which is why I'm making this article.

For those of you this article is intended for, I understand how you feel. For me, I myself feel a lack of power and influence over current and world events, and sometimes didn't put as much effort into spreading information as I should.

But, no matter what, don't be discouraged. All movements began with a few people, or even a single induvidual, and that movement moves forward becuase of individuals doing what they can. 

For example, let's say that, while facing discrimination, Martin Luther King and people like him felt so powerless that they didn't bother protesting what they believed was wrong. Or, when they protested what they believed was wrong, too many other people didn't bother helping them and thus, the civil rights movement failed to bring change. How would America be like today?

Remember great historical figures such as Ghandi? What if he was so intimidated by the British government & social standards that he got little to no progress done? Chances are, the British would rule over India, Pakistan & Bangladesh to this day at worst, or would hold on longer at best. 

What if Malala Yousafzai shut up when the Taliban attacked her, & what would've happened to education opportunities for females? 

What if the troops fighting the Axis during World War 2 were too scared to fight? And the Axis got access to highly advanced technology, such as atomic weapons? Chances are, planet Earth would be a very different place. 

This is what happens when too few people do what they could to try to bring change. Like StormCloudsGathering said on Charlie Hebdo - The Hidden Agenda Exposed, "If everyone did what they could, it would be enough".

I know that everyone has their fears, and fear has kept us & our ancestors, & probably will keep our descendents alive. But, we should not be paralyzed or affected by it so badly that we can't do what is necessary. It is exactly why I want people to watch the video before reading for several reasons. The reasons are that, not only are many Americans aren't up to speed on this (especially those who identify themselves as "liberal" or "progressive", not that I intend to attack all of them), but also, perhaps by human nature & probably made worse by our culture, many are too lazy or even scared to use unorthodox tactics, even when THEIR lives & the lives of loved ones would directly depend on it. 

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." - Albert Einstein.

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." - Edmund Burke.
"Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference has never tried to fall asleep with a mosquito in the room." - Christine Todd Whitman.

(You can find these quotes on Brainyquotes & Goodreads.)

I definitely do NOT want "Wolves", which are those who prey on others. I don't really want sheep, the average who don't do much good. I want more than porcupines, those who will defend themselves & maybe a few others but will only defend others under rather strict condition. 

What I want, & believe we need, are sheepdogs, those who will protect others, & willing to put themselves at risk if necessary.

I recommend watching the 2 videos below, and it is not required to watch the playlists.

(Also be sure to watch the video after the one below.)

If you want to bring real change, then look at the playlist of the video above and watch the 1st 14 videos.

If you're still not motivated, go here: .

Not sure what much else to say.

By the way, I believe that perhaps the biggest mistake the powers that be has made so far was releasing the internet to the general public. That is becuase the internet made the truth movement very strong. No more relying on big TV stations, newspapers, news agencies, radio stations or things like that. Now, average people can go online and get involved in the movement without so many of the hurdles of the past.

To give you an idea how effective this is, start by taking a look at the "A few truth & alternate media sites to look at & support list of fame" link list to the right of this blog. Compare the information offered by the sites (and YouTube channels) on that list (plus this blog) 

Hopefully, the powers that be won't try to go back in time and prevent the internet from being released to the general public (hopefully I'm not giving them ideas), or worse (and more realistically), implement an operational "Internet Kill Switch".

Trivia post: What Happened to Barriss Offee after The Clone Wars & Jedi temple bombing (my theroy)?

Regular visitors of this blog might've remembered my old post, A few parallels between Star Wars & the New World Order, how Barriss stayed in the Jedi order, & more. For some time, I've been thinking about making a renamed repost about my theory surrounding what happened Barriss Offee after confessing to the Jedi temple bombings, but haven't got around to doing so until I seen the video What Happened to Barriss Offee after The Clone Wars? (Theory), hoping that the post's title could draw some extra views from search engines indexing this page.

I'm sure that many of you remember seeing what happened to Barriss in The Clone Wars Season 5 finale. Though as you can read on, not much is known what happened to Barriss after she was caught by Anakin and confessed to the Jedi temple bombing. My theory is that, after the events depicted in the video above, Barriss had a trial of her own, and thanks to pleading guilty and an outstanding legal team, got her sentence reduced to a long time behind bars. 

But, as the war dragged on, the Jedi were desperate for more active warriors, and gave those facing punishment an extra chance. Perhaps Barriss had behaved perfectly while in prison, and, after a lengthy approval process, including permission from a jude, counseling, interviews, interviews of prison employees about her, and so on and so forth, while on parole, was allowed to rejoin the Jedi and be able to possess 1 operational weapon when on missions. However, Barriss wasn't allowed to possess any weapons when off duty, and must agree to being supervised at all times. The permits allowing her to be out of prison may be revoked at any time with or without specific reason, and will be revoked he she was ever caught misbehaving again.

Remember, since all of this happened on 20 BBY, and Order 66 happened just the year after, we would have to assume that Barriss was in prison for only a few months at the most, so her behavior must've acted outstandingly good and 110% squeaky sterile to not only get out early, but also, go into battle with a lethal weapon. 

This is somewhat relatable to real-life. In many countries, military, law enforcement, and security personnel are often restricted from bringing weapons home, of course, varying from country-to-country. This is somewhat relatable to Barriss, after being convicted of committing a serious crime, being restricted from possessing weapons.

A more closely relatable situation is seen in the United States in real life when it comes to convicted felons and firearms. In the U.S., under federal law, it is prohibited for a felon to buy a firearm (not including airguns or even antiques). 
However, some states do have a process for a felon to be legally allowed to purchase firearms again (from what I've read, believe it or not, this is allowed under state's rights), but it is quite lengthy from what I've heard (in Texas, for instance, the process takes like 5 years. Lookup "Texas Penal Code 46.04" for details). I also recommend watching Gun Gripes Episode 70: Convicted Felons and Guns for details, though the video only talks about Georgia (which is, by the way, my home state).

I've seen people who believe that the Seventh Sister may be Barriss Offee, and while she probably isn't, if she is, she may be Barriss with facial surgery, tattoos removed and changed voice. And I've seen someone make another claim, which can be read here:

Bonus: Barriss Offee and Ahsoka Tano both had an honorary mention in my post, Open message to muslims & non-muslims; rant on hijab. And are face coverings (ie niqab) appropriate/good?, to show that even though 2 individuals may dress almost oppositely (see picture below to give you an idea), that isn't a huge factor as to their character, values, or what they do in life. Here's a segment from that post:

"As far as friendship goes between individuals, I don't believe that clothing style really matters, but rather, the individual's values, belifs, and wishes. I assure you that friendships like the one between Ahsoka Tano (who wasn't exactly the most covered up character) and Barriss Offee (who dressed on the modest side) (who were, for icing on the cake, different but still fully sentient species) (minus the betrayal from the latter) can exist in real-life (I sometimes make a Star Wars reference).

 (This came from"

Sunday, April 10, 2016

Mini ramble: Who do I like less & why: the American political left wing or right wing, & George Walker Bush or Barack Hussein Obama?

For those of you who read my content and listen to the content I spread, I do NOT like the polarized American left or right wing. If I had to choose who I like less, however, it would be the left wing.

This is becuase of the left's operating mentality, philosophy (particulary with things such as only being casually anti-war, sometimes not argueing very well, rejecting truth that's too hot, screaming subjective labels such as "zealot" or objective but often wrong labels such as "racist" as excuses to not listen to someone) and lack of emotional control. 

Though my main beefs with the right are being neocons (with things such as being pro-war, and allowing the government to trample civil liberties such as privacy rights or other liberties as long as they don't feel the effects too much in everyday life), and to an extent, social issues, along with their ego's.

Essentially, while the right has plenty of issues, my main issue with the left is pretty much their whole mentality and philosophy in the 1st place, while my main issues with the right are mainly foreign policy and social issues.

Of course I disagree with many Americans who identify as socially conservative, who also tend to be politically conservative (not so much including paleoconservatives or conservatives who consider themselves "libertarian"), at least they're usually more practical than Americans who identify as liberal about it (not so much including classical liberals, who I'm more comfortable with, people such as TheYankeemarshal who I agree with about 98%+ of the time, or people who are more like the founding father type of liberals than modern day herd-mentality or tribalist liberals).
(Start at 3:38.)

As for the extreme right (ie Neo-Nazis, fascists, white supremacists, etc), while they may seem arguably better than the normal left or right in the short term because of their opposition to Zionism and often, war, many are openly authoritarian and, becuase of their authoritarian and extremely tribalistic and collectivistic herd mentality, are not so good in the long term. I do not support them nethertheless.

Now, onto George Walker Bush vs Barack Hussein Obama.

If I had to choose who I liked LESS, it would be Obama. Obama kept a whole lot of Bush's policies such as war, corporate bailouts, corporatism, the Patriot act, aid to dictatorships and the Israeli government, NAFTA, drug war, and so on and so forth. However, Obama signed in the NDAA, INCREASED aid to the Israeli government (, was more supportive of gun control, made the economy (particulary debt) worse and the anti-war movement mostly died out around 2008 and 2009 when Obama got into office, revealing that the anti-war movement was more of an anti-Republican tribalist movement. 

Saturday, April 9, 2016

Another video project: Who should we be voting for 2016?

As some of you already know, just this monday, I released my Ultimate argument for the right to self-defense & to keep & bear arms & armor, and while it was a relatively little challenge (compared to real life events, like maybe joining the military someday), however, it helped make me feel good about myself and what I'm doing for humanity.

Now, despite the fact that, so far, my article, Which candidates should we be voting for in 2016? And selected candidates by positive position on major issues, has over 100 views and counting, I do not feel that it is enough. I want to spread the information further. Thus, I am going to create a video version of the article becuase it is so important to inform the American people as to not only who should they vote for, but also, get more people to look at real issues that the mainstream media won't bring up and hopefully change the way Americans, and perhaps, the world does politics forever.

In the short term, this is intended to keep up support for Gary Johnson enough to keep him in the race, and to get more people to support him, along with Ron Paul, Jesse Ventura and Bob Barr, and to get people to stop supporting politicians like Hillary (supporting Hillary is ridiculous to me).

I'm planning to call it "Who should America vote for president in 2016, & Selected candidates by position on important issues".
Here's the pre-release poster:

I'm going to do the slideshow-video the same way as the 1st time I done it with the released version, but the process should be easier since I learned quite a bit from the 1st video-slideshow I made, plus the fact that I already have some decent music available to me.

Expect updates over the next 3 weeks, as that it should take me about 1 week to create the slideshow, and some extra time to do editing to the slideshow, film, and adding of music.

Also, just like before, expect a grand release, and once it's uploaded, it'll become the flagship video of my channel.

Monday, April 4, 2016

Finally: The video version of the ultimate argument for the responsibility of self-defense & right to keep & bear arms & armor is out!!!

After a total 2 weeks and a day of work, my masterpiece is COMPLETE!

After such as long time, after a lot of irritation, fustration work and effort, I have created a video that could potentially help fellow human beings across the world gain the right to keep and bear arms and armor, and thus, self defense.

I firmly believe that no human who has not commited unnecessary violence against other humans or animals should be deprived of the right to self-defense or to keep and bear arms and armor.

What motivated me to make this was to try to help fellow human beings worldwide to get the right to keep and bear arms and armor and adopt the responsibility of self-defense.
But, more directly, my motivation came from the irritation and fustration of seeing gun-control advocating videos pop-up in my internet searches, having gun-control advocating comments looking popular in the comments section of internet videos, and the big-name media blaring out anti-gun messages to the world's people. Instead of putting my head into the ground and practically giving up, I channeled negative feelings into a positive cause.

This is not to simply help people who want to legally own and possess arms and armor in the United States of America and Canada; the situation is getting better for both. This is actually made to help people worldwide, even though the target audience would be people in the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and other English-speaking countries. But, I would be more than happy if the video was translated into other languages.

If you like it, please share it!!! Long live the natural right to self-defense and to keep and bear arms and armor!

Links to images used in part 1 (again, nothing in repeated. Links will be in the description of the original video):,,, (couldn’t find picture of protest, as that this was done after making the rest of the slideshow),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 

Part 2:, (couldn’t find image of Mahatma Ghandi),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,'_Party_of_Korea (the picture depicted in this slideshow is porbably a cropped version of this one),,
Part 3:,,,,,,_organization_and_structure,, (couldn’t find picture of African troops),,,,,_Jr._Montgomery_arrest_1958.jpg,,,,,,, 
Part 4: (cropped screenshot of FBI information piece from,,,,

Sunday, April 3, 2016

100th post: A little setback to the slideshow for self-defense

Even though the slideshow version of my ultimate argument is on YouTube and is private for editing (, I found out the hard way that I can't find a way to add my own downloaded music to the video after it's been uploaded, so I have to delete it and start all over again. Even though it doesn't need re-filming, I'm deciding to do so anyway, as that the filming part is easy; only about 9 minutes long, the timing between slides should be better, and the music would be listed and rightful creator credited. The harder, and more frustrating part, is converting it into wmv format for YouTube to accept it, which is unbelievably frustrating. I got impatient today just over this alone.

As for the music, I wanted it to be "Requiem For A Dream" because to me, it felt dramatic, and amplified emotions. Even though there are free downloads for it, being copyrighted, I can't use it unless I pay for it (I am unwilling to go through the hassle of investing for simple background music at this point). So, while not quite as good, I'll use the "Andy S Ill" version, which isn't copyrighted (

Nevertheless, I PROMISE you: if I don't upload it today, I will upload it tomorrow.

Here's the thumbnail:

A little criticism about David Duke's bias & minor accuracy, along with human psychology, sociology & social issues regarding homosexuality

For those of you who looked at my YouTube channel enough, while I do use David Duke as a source quite a bit and I do link to his website , I do NOT agree with many of his opinions. 

And, as explained in the videos below, you REALLY have to question some the of the things he says, and touched upon in this article, he is quite biased. This is NOT limited to his association of openly hateful race supremacists (many prefer the label "nationalist"), which discredits the truth movement, makes it even harder to talk about political truth if Zionism, Zionists, Jewish supremacists or powerful people who are Jewish and alienates people from joining certain parts of the truth movement. This issue is further explained in Why are white nationalists/supremacists, Neo-Nazis & fascists in the comments so often, some theories, a personal story & how to solve the problem.

And, let me know if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, while David Duke may not be a fan of the Ku Klux Klan anymore and implies having a non-positive view on the KKK as said in David Duke Responds to CNN - Speaks to Trump & All Americans, I have not seen him fully renounce his membership or directly denounce the KKK and has membership on a white supremacist forum.
(For some reason, Blogger seems to be bugging out, which is why these characters are blue.)

My response to the Race and Reality playlist (which is indirectly talked about in the above videos): when it comes to culturally diverse places being violent, Duke has left out countless factors, such as standard of living, economics, availability of services, education, substance (ie drug and alcohol) use, presence of chemicals, law enforcement effectiveness, population age and even what counts as a certain crime & data manipulation just to name a few. 

There are rather diverse places that are not that dangerous or poor. For example, Lilburn and Duluth, Georgia, in Gwinnett county (which I'm a current resident of) are pretty diverse, yet rather safe. However, they aren't really "big cities" like Detroit, Michigan.

Besides, I believe that people should be allowed to choose which groups to be around and not to be around. I do not believe in using the force of the state to force people to be separate or together.

Warning: taboo topics ahead. This is not for ultra-sensitive.

My response to Freud, Zionism and Sexual Revolution: while Duke may bring up some good looking points, like many people, it is not without bias. For example, he points to the entertainment media and claims that it is degrading the moral values of America, and while he does use some evidence, I agree that parents weren't as good as they used to be (Epic Parental Fail) and 'Black' subculture is a Hollywood creation does talk about a related issue, I question how much tangible damage is being done as claimed in the 1st video mentioned. 
Teen birth rates have been declining. There are 11 states that had a rate of 30.0 to 39.9 in 2014. 23 states had a rate of 20.0 to 29.9 in 2014. All other states have a rate of less than 20. U.S. teen birth rate was 24.2 in 2014.
Despite things such as the social liberalisation of sexuality and growth in popularity of pornography, teen birth rates have actually went DOWN. Also see Fewer American Teens Are Getting Pregnant, and No One Knows Why, and Teen pregnancy rates level off in Canada, study shows.

Teen pregnancy has declined from 59.9 per 1000 females ages 15-19 in 1990 to 24.2 in 2014. Teen pregnancy has declined since 1990 from 100.3 per 1000 females ages 15-19 in Hispanics and 166.2 per 1000 females ages 15-19 in blacks to 38 and 34.9 respectively. Teen pregnancy has declined at a faster rate for hispanics and blacks than for whites.

As shown in the other infographic in, many of the states that have a teen birth rate of 30.0 to
39.9 are actually in THE BIBLE BELT!!! How come such socially conservative places get such high teen birth rates while more socially liberal places such as New Hampshire (my favourite state in the union) has comparatively low teen birth rates? 

How Do Sex and Power Abuses Lead to Terrorism and War? (I do not blame conflict in the middle east or Africa for sexual repression or things like that, but this gives some ideas),
Ten Politically Incorrect Truths About Human Nature (same as for the case above),
What Motivates Sexual Promiscuity?.

As explained in the articles above, sexual repression seems to cause more problems than it solves. This may also explain things such as why men in sexually repressed cultures in the middle east do blatantly immoral, unethical and outright ridiculous and crazy things such as raping animals (goats in particular), have militants attack grocers for having "immodest" vegetables, or, while less crazy but still very much immoral and unethical, have involuntary sex with females, and so on and so forth (no, I do not hate all middle eastern people or Muslims. However, just as I believe in punishing evildoers, I believe in at least deporting or making troublemakers work for their victims as punishment for their crimes, and I strongly believe that some aspects of some cultures are better than others).

So, in some cultures, it seems that, if a guy can't have (consensual) fun with females, then he may try animals or non-consensual fun (for him) with females. Also, if a female shows too much skin or looses her virginity before marriage, she'll be in some deep schmit. And, if a person of either gender is caught touching their, er, you know what's, they may also be in deep schmit. This is one explanation as to why involuntary body modification in these areas are so prevalent in certain cultures.

Also, sexually repressed cultures, such as the middle eastern or Inis Beag seem to be more unhappy than more sex positive cultures such as the Mangaia, Trobriand islanders, Marquesas Islanders, or, and perhaps especially, hunter-gatherers. Then again, happiness is extremely subjective, and other factors aren't included. But, what do we expect from trying to suppress nature?

“If man attempts to suppress the animal side of his nature by a sheer effort of conscious will,
nature finds a hundred unexpected and unpleasant ways to take its revenge.” – Christopher Dawson (NOT to be confused with Ryan Dawson), found credit of

When it comes to sexual violence such as rape, lookup the words "Porn up, rape down".

As explained in the video above, accurate sex-ed seems to actually combat things like teen pregnancy better than abstinence-only "education". Though, as a libertarian, I, reluctantly, would leave it up to parents to decide what program to put their kids in even though on a personal level being educated at all things, including human sexuality, is a good thing.

Pretty much the only caveat to the information just shown is the increase of births to unmarried women and people with HIV/AIDS (look it up), which I'm not sure if the liberalization of civil unions (I don't think you have it call it "marriage") would make it much worse, and I'm willing to bet that this can be combated with safe sex practices, access to contraceptives and so on.

As for the issue on non-straight people, watch the video below.

I have yet to see a solid, tangible argument against homosexuality, with the most common being "it offends god", and the best being "homosexuals are more likely to get STD's". For the former, I personally do not believe in having the state be the enforcement arm for the most powerful being in the universe; god should be able enforce his rules on his own.

Assuming that homosexuality is evil only becuase perhaps the devil/satan created it (assuming he exists) can be argued to saying that anti-smoking campaigns are evil because the person who led the 1st anti-smoking campaign had a garbage sense of morals and ethics (Adolf Hitler). If the devil/satan created homosexuality (again, assuming that he exists), unless there is evidence that is solid to the secular point of view, 

Even if homosexuality was unnatural, perhaps so are people with blond, red or dark brown hair or blue eyes should be treated for being mistakes of nature; the latter two are, at least, sometimes seen as mutations by the scientific community ( Does it really matter?

As far as unnatural things go, was it entirely bad for us to move out of our ancestor's hunter gatherer or primitive agricultural lifestyles into more modern lifestyles?

And as far as natural things are concerned, are things such as lead, arsenic, mercury, venom, or other poisons good, or are natural diseases or disasters, or violence between beings significantly less bad just becuase they're natural?

Also read:

(As a bonus, I'll mention the article, 6 Reasonable Arguments For Why Gay Marriage Will End Civilization, which doesn't feel very convincing to me and I am not even sure if it is serious or satirical. As for the slippery slope to the legalization of bestiality, which I do NOT want legalized, I really question the logic.)

I'd also like to mention that the Japanese are seen as rather sexualized, but from what I can tell, they're just fine. 
Hungary seems to be against the Rothschilds and New World Order, but is pretty open to pornography and sex doesn't seem too taboo.
And, (unorganised) prostitution is legal in Poland and Hungary (

I can understand cases of EXTREME individualism, such as abusing living beings, distributing or creating content depicting real abuse for non-educational purposes, and so on and so forth. Though as long as the rights of others as respected (which isn't the case just described), I don't have big issues with what someone does in their life.

And as a bonus, I'll mention Philosophy & social issues rant: Savage vs Civilized dichotomy, oversimplification, gray areas, collectivism, hypocrisy & double standards.

Before social conservatives get mad at me, well, let my favorite political commentator add his 2 cents, from 16:40 to 17:07:

When it comes to my personal opinions on how human sexuality in a culture should be, I prefer not to talk about it in public at this point beyond social issues.

As for How We Can Defeat Zio Globalism!, Duke also fails to mention that, despite the increase in playing violent video games, at least in the United States of America, murder rates are, since 1996, overall, going down. He also doesn't mention the drugging of America, and claims that, during his time, America had no gun laws. While I am STRONGLY pro self-defense and right to keep and bear arms and armor, actually, America has many local, state, and federal weapon laws. You can find this out by doing a little research on the topic.

So as you can see, Duke is accurate for the most part (inaccurate mainly on a few small things), yet very much biased.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the reason why David Duke has his views on issues relating to sexuality is becuase he is a social conservative and, as usual, resents what goes against the values and belifs they want to keep.

Saturday, April 2, 2016

The video-slideshow for the right to self-defense & to keep & bear arms & armor is close to filming & release

For those of you who has seen my article, Perhaps my most ambitious project so far, why I'm going to start to make accounts on gun forums, plus my "threat level", I have been working on the slideshow version of my ultimate argument for the right to self-defense & to keep & bear arms & armor ( Whenever I see gun-control advocating videos on the internet pop up in searches or gun-control advocating comments get popular on the internet, it motivates me further to do what I can to help fellow human beings around the world, and instead in burying my head to try to ignore it in despair, my irritation and frustration is channeled to make me do what I feel is right.

I'll film the argument using Screen Recorder, convert it into a YouTube-acceptable format with Windows Live Movie Maker, add some music, and then release it.

When the video is released, I'll have a grand opening for it; I'll share it to my active social media profiles, particulary on Pinterest, share it with extended circles plus major allies on YouTube, and so on and so forth. Soon, I would share it with communities on Google+, on Facebook pages, and so on and so forth.

By the way, the main reason why I don't do other issues (ie elections, Israel-Palestine conflict) is because other issues, to meet the standards that I have for my own arguments, use up a lot of information from dozens, and possibly, hundreds, of internet articles and videos, making it too hard to put into a practical slideshow format video at this point.

Edit: the video was filmed. It's going to be saved to YouTube to day.

Update: video on YouTube, private. In editing phase.

Do you like my "Read if you're making assumptions about me" post?

Google+ Badge