Follow by Email


Saturday, October 31, 2015

Securing the future of all people, reducing xenophobia & critiquing fear of Islamic takeover

Long title: Securing the future of caucasian race, critiquing fear of Islamic takeover & combating fascists, Neo-Nazis, white supremacists & xenophobia

Before I get started, let me say this: I am NOT a white supremacist (or even nationalist) and nor do I hate all Muslims. From the nature of this article, I could perfectly understand why, even though I have directly addressed fascists, Neo-Nazis and race supremacists (, and anti-Muslim people ( before. And before you call me a racist, go read

Before you read, as always, remember to QUESTION EVERYTHING, even what I say or write. If you disagree, I have little problem with that. Everything is my personal opinion at the time that the article was posed and is not intended to reflect the opinion of anyone else unless otherwise stated.
While some of these ideas may sound a bit silly, just bear with me, please. And I do NOT hate all poor people; I know that many of us are just a check away from losing a lot of what we now own. Yet it would be extremely irresponsible to have brats and not even raise them correctly. Along with this, I am pretty sure that overpopulation would hurt us a LOT more than nonviolent and non-forced population control.

For some time, white nationalist groups have gotten some power for many reasons. A few catalysts for these are the population decline of caucasians, the population increase of places such as Africa, and non-caucasian immigration into countries with a caucasian majority (look these up yourself). The primary one I'll talk about is the population decline of caucasians, with the African population increase and number of Muslims coming after.

When it comes to the demographics on caucasians, it's not very good; reportedly, countries with what were once white-majority are said to end up with a white minority.
When it comes to the demographics of Africa, the population is shooting up like crazy, despite the fact that people are still, unfortunately, poor (when will the entire human species use common sense?)
When it comes to the demographics of Muslims, well, it's scary;
While I won't deny the Muslim population increase, look up the words "Islam dying", which does ease the scariness of Muslim supremacy on Earth (and may make antithesist and anti-Islam people alike happy). If push came to shove, we might have to put Muslim immigration on hold, slow down and reduce births and maybe slow down conversion, though hopefully we won't have to do that.

Here is my idea of how to secure the future of the caucasian race, and at the same time, take out a catalyst for xenophobia in Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand nonviolently; in poor places where the population is growing faster than it can support it, encourage people to practice abstinence if possible, though definitely also use birth control and contraceptives to slow down population growth. If this isn't enough, try other techniques such as rewarded/paid tube-tying and vasectomies and things like that. I would exclude minority groups and target large groups at first (I don't want groups who already have only a few members to become extinct). At the same time, in places where the population is too low, birth rates are too slow or a particular group of people is too few in number, encourage them to have kids. Though we better be careful.

Now, I'd like to mention that I wanted to have my STOP HAVING KIDS!!! Adopt instead! translated into languages spoken in poor countries. But the creation of my article (which essentially combines the videos) it is slow, not only becuase of time constrictions but also, I am not sure if I would be able to reach enough people, and besides, why do poor people have so many kids? What happened to their decision making? It probably went to schmit.

Do you agree? Disagree? Any ideas, questions, concerns comments or anything in that matter? Leave it in the comments! I love getting feedback from viewers, and I want to learn about new ideas.
Though if I make anyone mad, offend anyone, lose readers or anything in that matter, I understand.

Extra: there are a few articles out there that says that Africa is underpopulated, and thus, needs more people to make their economy better. I feel that perhaps we should set up a population distribution system in Africa to allow people in areas with a high population density to move to underpopulated areas. At the same time, somehow get financial institutions to stop ripping off Africa, set up better education systems, and perhaps even look into re-dividing Africa so people wouldn't be fighting so much. My logic is that if you know someone who's incompatible with you, just don't hang out with them. The state shouldn't be needed to intervene.

Friday, October 30, 2015

Open message to readers

Currently, I only have a few dedicated readers so far. For you readers, please reveal yourselves to me. If you don't want to drop a comment, then send me a P.M. by any of these links; You can use these as well, but do NOT expect a fast response; . Thank you for reading.

Strange happenings & problems on my school bus. And a few things about bus monitors.

On Friday the 23rd in October of 2015, I suggested to my afternoon bus driver and monitor that the transmission, and perhaps, braking system problems that we had with our bus (Thomas C2, model year currently unknown) that we have been having for weeks, if not months now (there are times when we should stop at a kid's house to drop him off and the bus won't move after that. On Friday the 23rd of October 2015, the driver had to turn off and restart the bus several times before we could move again.) was becuase of sabotage. In the conspiracy, the powers that be (I didn't say "Illuminati" or "Big bankers" becuase I wasn't in a mood to open a can of worms) decided to sabogae one of my modes of transportation to make me easier to target.
We talked a bit, and the bus monitor asked (NOT in an interrogation manner) if I was on some terror watch list or something. I probably said something along the lines of "Probably not" (though I should've mentioned an article called "72 types of Americans that are considered 'terrorists'". And shoot: I supported Ron Paul, have a somewhat negative view of the United Nations, oppose illegal immigration, strongly believe in the right to keep and bear arms and self defense, believe in conspiracy "theories", anti global[ist], my blog and the websites I look at would be, albeit questionable accuracy, considered "extremist", I have a quite a fear of gun control, though I am more concerned about people in other countries getting disarmed, I want to protect the environment and animals, and worst of all (judging from the number order), I want to make the world a better place. I am for individual liberties, however, I don't talk about them much, if at all, aside from self defense and free speech. At least I don't really associate myself with the Patriot movement due to some extreme elements, I do NOT like sovereign citizens because they make conservatives, gun owners and political truth people look bad, and am STRONGLY pro-secularism.), and nor am I a high profile person or even advocated violence (the closest thing to violence that I advocated was self defense).

However, there are quite a few reasons why whatever problems the bus had and the fact it carries a political truth person 5 days an average week was probably a coincidence.
1: if the bus was sabotaged, would the mechanics find out about it? I'm not a mechanic or secret agent (or Terminator like machine or anything in that matter), so I couldn't be sure. Then again, they could always bribe the mechanics to sabotage the vehicle. Though they better keep quiet!
2: isn't there a better time to assassinate or capture me other than when I'm riding in several tons of rolling metal? Sure, I am not riding in an armored car, but the driver can probably push it a bit hard if he/she is in a survival situation.
3: how many potential witnesses do you have to worry about? It may not be too long for an event like this to become well known if enough people do it at the same time.

Open message to bus mechanics: have you noticed any of the problems that I have described on the Thomas C2? If so, please tell me, and be sure to give me as much information (such as year, engine and transmission model) as you can. Thanks.

Thoughts on bus monitors.
A few weeks ago, a lady that rode on my bus sneaked on. The monitor was like "Where is she?", and found out the lady in question sneaked on under her nose. I said to her something along the lines of that the should pay more attention to her surroundings, and that she was the closest thing to a law enforcement or security officer. She said "Thanks for the comment". On one day she was out, I talked to the driver about why I preferred having a monitor on the vehicle with me, which is that she is able to provide help immediately, as opposed to emergency services who would be minutes away when seconds count, though the driver said that regular-ed kids who ride on long buses often ride without monitors and they're just fine. I told her a quote I found, which is "If all your problems are behind you... you must be a school bus driver". When we got to me stop that day she said "Yay. You got home safely without the bus monitor! (that was kind've a joke.)". The day after that, we had a substitute monitor and the driver joked by saying something along the lines of "Hey, now we have a monitor in case of an medical emergency (again, I don't perfectly remember what she said)" (the day the monitor was out, I did say something quite like "A lightly or untrained or lightly or unequipped bus monitor is immediately more useful than SWAT., paramedics or [other] emergency services 5 minutes away becuase they could provide help immediately."). After that, the monitor was back.
Believe it or not, while I only recognise any arrests bus or hallway monitors make as citizen's arrests as opposed to what I would call "official arrests" made by people such as law enforcement officers, security personnel, and fugitive recovery/bail enforcement agents/bounty hunters (if the individual being arrested is a fugitive), I treat them pretty much like I would treat a security guard/officer becuase I see that they serve a similar function and are as close as we got to having security personnel.
I personally think that anyone and everyone working in public safety even outside of law enforcement (security, bus monitoring, hallway monitoring etc), should be well armed, equipped, and most importantly, trained for situations that can arise. If something crazy happens (not World revolution war stories crazy, but still,  you can look up bus attacks in history), I don't want the vehicle passengers' protector to be limited to a handgun in a fanny pack and rifle or shotgun in a bag. At least a tiny handful are armed, such as this Texas Youth Authority bus guard from the movie "Holes".
(Got this credit of Internet Movie Firearms Database.)

I know that a lot of people would disagree with my idea of what public safety workers are and how they should be trained and equipped. Then again, my more tactical idea of this type of occupation probably comes from me watching movies, video-gameplays and, yes, making up stories.

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Loose cannons: Alex Jones, NRA, Ted Nugent, CAIR & Louis Farrakhan

(Long title; Loose cannons: Alex Jones, National Rifle Association, Ted Nugent, & why I do NOT support the Council on American-Islamic relations or Louis Farrakhan)
(Got this credit of Pinterest.)

Because of the many issues that I'm involved in, sooner or later, I'll come across loose cannons. The 4 worst are the Council on American-Islamic Relations/CAIR, Louis Farrakhan, the National Rifle Association/NRA, and Ted Nugent. In my view, Louis Farrakhan's and Ted Nugent's mouths are like "Dirty" Harry Callahan's trigger finger. But worse; 1 is a movie character. 2 are famous public figures.
And, if CAIR and the NRA were countries, they would be like the Soviet Union to the allies during WW2, but for the former, also worse, and I'll tell you why.

First, CAIR; I know that CAIR has been at the forefront on fighting anti-Muslim and anti-Arab hate, but, I view it is a loose cannon, and is a forced and reluctantly accepted "ally" at best, and a low level enemy at worst. CAIR has been linked to "terrorism". Go read , and that is just to start. CAIR must not only denounce, but EXPEL AND SHUN people who have any connection or support for militant groups whatsoever.
When it comes to CAIR's history with Hamas, even though that I know that Hamas is combating the current Israeli government, they just harm too many civilians to have me be at their side, and not all Palestinians even support them
While I do NOT want to support this site, I just thought to throw in this link; .

Also, I do NOT really support Louis Farrakhan for so many reasons that I want you to look up a lot of the bad things he has said before. I won't even begin to say what comes out of his mouth, but he shoves his foot in his mouth like Ted Nugent.

You can call me a hypocrite from "not distancing" myself from shady characters (such as David Duke). But actually, I make the disclaimer that I do NOT always agree with the views or support my source persons. To me, they're almost like a black market dealer who supplies me with the things I need. I might not like them, but I need to get what they have available.

Later, I'll talk about Alex Jones.

Second, the NRA and Ted Nugent. I am not going to attack the NRA on its compromises, but rather, who it allows to represent it; they still show us a LOT of right-wing people. I know that a majority of self defense and right to keep and bear arms supporting Americans are right-wing oriented, though it does not need to be in our image; I feel like that, while doing things such as including minorities, especially with stereotype breakers such as Chris Cheng,, and the fact that gun culture is changing, people like Ted Nugent are allowed to yack away and hardly anyone from the gun community calls him out (except for a few such as Robert Farago on; ).

Onto Alex Jones; I'm not saying he's a bad guy, but he is definitely a loose cannon. Even though his channel is not listed in my YouTube channel's "PLEASE SUB & HELP THE TRUTH!=D"  section, and I'm considering removing Mark Dice's channel from it, I wouldn't say that Alex Jones is totally bad (, but he is undoubtedly suspicious. Again, I do not think that is necessarily bad, just really suspicious.

Sadly, the 2 videos below really hurts my formally strong trust for Jones;

Though in his defense, I'll add in this as well, though I am closer to the side of Truthfulradio than TruthRadioShow;

And be careful about Wikileaks.

Be sure to check out the suspicious things about other mainstream truthers (NOT that I am saying for myself that these are fakes)...

Saturday, October 24, 2015

Trenger vi mer våpenkontroll? Hvis du tror det, kan du lese.

Mesteparten av det følgende vil være min parafrasering basert på to videoer, kalt "den egentlige hensikten med den andre Amendment - The Ultimate Kritikk av Gun Control" og "The Divine Right of Self Defense - Mike Adams dokumentar". Del én vil være det meste fra "den egentlige hensikten med den andre Amendment - The Ultimate Kritikk av Gun Control", mens del to er mer basert på "The Divine Right of Self Defense - Mike Adams dokumentar". Del tre vil ha min egen kreasjon. Alt er av min mening. På ingen måte er denne artikkelen ment å representere synspunktene til noen annen person eller gruppe. Vær også lage kommentarer.

Del én: Mange er enige om at vi alle har umistelige, eller guddommelige rettigheter, som er rettigheter som ikke bør tas bort. Bare for å nevne noen, mange er enige om at vi alle bør ha rett til å få tilgang til rent vann, god mat, fredelig sammen, snakke uten frykt, praksis religion (så lenge andre ikke påvirkes negativt) (og, i hvert fall for noen av deg, kanskje til og med bli hjulpet eller tatt vare på når det er nødvendig). Men det er en rett vi ofte glemmer; retten til forsvar av seg selv og andre. Den merkelige ting om rettigheter, er at de er faktisk grenser. Ytringsfrihet, for eksempel, ikke kan eksistere uten grenser er etablert for å hindre at de i kraft fra skade eller fengsle de som taler imot dem. Men hvem som er ansvarlig for å opprettholde disse grensene? Du kan tro du har til å rette opp tale. Men hva skjer med disse rettighetene da en gruppe væpnede menn begynner å bevege seg fra bygning til bygning, hjem til hjem skadet, drepte og / eller kidnappe de som er uenige med dem.
Dette eksakte scenario utspilte seg på nytt og på nytt gjennom historien.
Det holder å gjenta egentlig ikke fordi historien har blitt glemt, men heller det ikke er riktig forstått. Hva hvis de som er ofre for nøyaktig samme scenario hadde en kjempe sjanse?
Du mener at regjeringen bør ha monopol på makt. Men i virkeligheten, gjengen av væpnede menn som jeg beskrev ER ofte regjeringen.
Det var regjeringene i verden som var ansvarlige for folkemord, etnisk rensinger, og massedrap av sivile. Det var regjeringene som utryddet politiske og religiøse dissidenter. Det var regjeringene som bygget konsentrasjonsleirene og hemmelige fengsler. Det var regjeringene som har begått de verste forbrytelser mot menneskeheten. Regjeringer har vist seg å være de mest korrupte, mest hensynsløse organisasjoner på planeten. Selv alle de verste masse skyttere kombinert kan ikke engang komme i nærheten av omfanget av skaden overmannet regjeringer har forårsaket.

 Når folk har ingen midler til å forsvare har regjeringen ingen reelle grenser. Vi kan ikke bare håpe at deres undersåtter (ofte militære og politi som adlyder) å være ulydig. Som bare tillater at prosessen skal starte helt på nytt. Du kan tro at regjeringen kan være fri for korrupsjon, men i virkeligheten, maktposisjoner tiltrekker tyranner, bøller og psykopater som gjødsel tiltrekker seg fluer. Det har alltid, og vil alltid. Regjeringen tiltrekker slike individer på grunn av makt over andre. Og for glasur på kaken, de får en lønnsslipp! Hva mer kan en slik person muligens be om?

 Når typer mennesker beskrevet komme inn, hvem ville du slå til? Du kan ikke få sikkerhet ved å gi mer av din makt og rettigheter bort til noen andre. Roten av problemet er en total monopol på makt. Løsningen er å gi INGEN MONOPOLER PERIODE. Vi som mennesker rett og slett ikke er modne nok til å håndtere den type fristelser. Sann kraftbalansen må opprettholdes. Retten til selvforsvar er at motvekt. Det er den grensen som virkelig gjør andre rettigheter mulig. Vi er til syvende og sist de som er ansvarlig for å beskytte oss selv og hverandre. Men retten til forsvar er meningsløst uten midler til å forsvare seg (for eksempel en tungt bevæpnet befolkningen). Det er derfor jeg tror rett til forsvar av seg selv og andre er en kjerne riktig dyr, inkludert mennesker, uansett rase, religion, seksuell orientering, etnisitet, kjønn identitet, nasjonal opprinnelse, hudfarge og / eller andre kjennetegn.

(Merk; denne videoen er videreført i "Gun Control er Genocide")
Del to.

 Folk som er rasjonell, sindige og følger etiske regler og moral verken oppsøke eller skape vold og de-eskalere det på hver sjanse. Dette bør være hvordan alle mennesker til å fungere, spesielt de som er bevæpnet. Kanskje de beste menneskene vi kan finne er de som forakter vold, men er villig til å slippe løs det på voldelige rovdyr hvis de ikke har noen annen måte å stoppe rovdyr (e). Retten til forsvaret av selvtillit og andre bør ikke være selektivt riktig for noen mennesker, for eksempel polititjenestemenn og militært personell mens selektivt feil for andre, for eksempel vanlige folk som ikke begår vold. Dessuten, etter mitt syn, polititjenestemenn og militært personell er bare borgere fått tillatelse og ekstra (men ikke ubegrenset) makt ved vi, vanlige folk. Politi bør direkte beskytte våre lokalsamfunn, mens den militære gir et eksternt forsvar, bare for å bli utplassert direkte i lokalsamfunn hvis det er absolutt nødvendig (i situasjoner som katastrofer, invasjoner, stor sivil uro eller en krise på den måten). Private sikkerhets skal beskytte privat eiendom og dekselet når rettshåndhevelse er utilgjengelig. Diffuse utvinning / kausjon tvangsmidler (dusørjegere) skal jakte på kriminelle.
Mange vil være enige i at det er riktig å forårsake smerte, skade eller død for en voldelig psykopat som allerede hadde drept flere personer og har til hensikt å drepe flere. Men et spørsmål som forvirrer noen er ganske eller ikke det er riktig å gjøre det til folk, heller de være vanlige folk, eller en rettshåndhevelse offiser eller militært personell. Selv om dette kan høres skummelt og være kontroversiell, ja, det er den riktige tingen å gjøre heller, eller ikke noen har på seg en uniform. Polititjenestemenn og militært personell er fortsatt mennesker. De, som stort sett alle mennesker, er ikke perfekt, og kan fortsatt gå dårlig, akkurat som enhver annen person kan.

 For å runde delen to opp, og vitenskap mennesker kan liker denne delen, som forklart i "The Divine Right of Self Defense - Mike Adams dokumentar", mange planter og dyr utøve sin rett til selvforsvar. Kaktus, for eksempel, har skarpe pigger som lærer dyr å holde seg borte. Tilsvarende pinnsvin har pigger som gjør det samme. En fugl som bruker en varierte forsvarsmekanisme er den sørlige Grey Petrel, som hadde en mage som produserer voksestere og triglyserider, som kan være prosjektil spydde på rovdyr. Noen Tarantulas det som kalles "urticating hår / bust", som kan bli knipset ut i luften på et mål ved hjelp av sine bakbena. Disse hårene kan irritere, og kan også være dødelig for små dyr. Mange arter av insekter har kjemiske våpen til disposisjon. Den Bombardier Beetle, for eksempel, bruker termiske kjemiske reaksjoner til å lansere en kokende, skadelig kjemisk spray i raske pulser fra spesielle kjertler i magen. Noen maur (spesifikt, tre maur) kan spray syre. Noen Gekkoer kan fyre av en svart eller blek klissete væske fra kjertler i halen for avstander opp til ca en meter med god hensikt. The Spitting Cobra kan spraye gift fra fremovervendt hull i sine hoggtenner, spytter opp til 1,5 meter. California jordekorn har blitt kjent for å bekjempe rovdyr som slanger ved å sparke skitt inn i øynene. Elefanter har vært kjent for å kaste forskjellige gjenstander.
Noen primater, inkludert mennesker, har vært kjent for å kaste forskjellige gjenstander. Og som en bonus, vil jeg nevne at Turtles og Skilpadder, sammen med skalldyr, har beskyttende skall, som er dyr kroppen rustning, hvis du vil. Naturens tilsvarer dagens bullet motstandsdyktig vester.
Hvorfor er dette viktig? Mange politikere sier at de vil ha den menneskelige arter som skal avvæpnes. Selv om ikke bare er dette i seg selv er et brudd på en guddommelig rett, men også, er det ikke mulig å fullt avvæpne hver siste menneske på planeten. Å avvæpne folk, må folk gjør avvæpning være bevæpnet, og dermed blir det mer som strøm omfordeling enn nedrustning.

Del tre.
Så du tror at et demokrati (eller republikk) vil alltid være steril av korrupsjon? Demokrati er som steril av korrupsjon som religiøse hellige bøker er av vold. Selv om dette kan høres klisjéaktige, har jeg endret dette argumentet rundt, la oss se på Nazi-Tyskland. Weimar-republikken var i en dårlig situasjon fra slutten av andre verdenskrig man til starten av Nazi-Tyskland. Da Adolf Hitler kom opp, lovende folk en masse gode ting ville komme da han var i kraft. Og gjett hva? Han Goose trappet sine egne folk inn i en historie med blodsutgytelse. Han avvæpnet alle unntatt for den såkalte "herrefolket", som gjorde det lettere å drepe jøder, homofile, sigøynere, politiske fiender og mer. Adolf Hitler kom fra høyre. Josef Stalin kom fra venstre. Men begge var i stand til å gjøre akkurat det samme.

Noen mennesker gjør argumentet om at våpnene besatt av sivile er lite til ingen match for de besatt av regjeringen. Men ikke bare gjøre mange av de personene som bruker dette argumentet har liten eller ingen politi eller militær erfaring, og ofte har ikke mye kunnskap, eller i det minste tror ikke dypt tenke på historien. Bare spør folk fra Vietnam, Nicaragua, Irak, og Afghanistan bare for å nevne noen. Geriljastyrker fra disse landene, sammen med diverse kriminelle og motstandsmannen alike (ofte fra den tredje verden) motstått ofte bedre utstyrt militære styrker, og lyktes. Jada, i noen tilfeller de fikk hjelp fra eksterne kilder (kommunistiske blokken regjeringer levert kommunistiske Vietnam under Vietnam-krigen, mens myndighetene i USA leveres anti kommunistiske Afghanistan), men verken mindre de vant. Dessuten kan anti rustning og antiluft våpen fanges fra regjerings armories og militære enheter. Ting som fly, pansrede kjøretøyer og artilleri er ofte ment for støtte og vil ikke garantere seier. Jeg vil ikke nekte for at teknologien vil være en faktor, men det er definitivt ikke den eneste faktoren. Det er ikke lett for militære eller politi enheter for å fortsette å kjempe når de får lite eller ingen framgang for sitt harde arbeid.

 Jeg vil bryte opp dette med noen sitater. De fleste fra gode mennesker, ett (Mao Zedong) fra en av de mest onde. Og jeg vet at Malcolm X. VAR rasistisk mot hvite, men til slutt ombestemte han seg.

 "Når det gjelder 'vold' - det er kriminelt å lære folk om ikke å forsvare seg selv, når de er ofre for stadige brutale angrep." "Jeg vil ikke engang kalle det vold når det er i selvforsvar, jeg kaller det intelligens." "Non Vold er greit så lenge det fungerer." "Hvis du har en hund, må jeg ha en hund. Hvis du har en rifle, må jeg ha en rifle. Hvis du har en klubb, må jeg ha en klubb. Dette er likestilling." - Malcolm X.

 "Frihet er aldri frivillig gitt ved undertrykkeren; det må kreves av den undertrykte. "- Martin Luther King.

 "Legitim bruk av vold kan bare være det som er nødvendig i selvforsvar." - Ron Paul.

 "Politisk makt vokser ut av løpet på en pistol." - Mao Zedong.

PS: ønsker du å holde lokalsamfunn trygt fra kriminalitet og vold? Da må vi ta opp andre problemer, for eksempel økonomi, tilgjengelighet av tjenester, rusmiddelbruk og befolkningstetthet bare for å nevne noen. Det er steder med mye våpen som ikke er det vold, for eksempel Kennesaw, Georgia (som krever hver husstand å ha et skytevåpen) og Svalbard, Norge, som krever at alle skal vite hvordan du bruker en rifle mot isbjørn. Begrense livløse objekter som våpen (det er nok av eksempler på hjemmelagde våpen og ammunisjon) er ikke nok til å ta opp selve sykdommen og ikke symptomene. Hvis jeg hadde min måte på kontroll våpen, kan jeg forbedre bakgrunnssjekk system (spesielt oppdatere informasjon om personer), og gjøre det ulovlig for en voldelig forbryter å eie våpen eller bevisst overføre våpen til voldelige forbrytere. Jeg vil bare tillate registrering dersom en ekstremt høy andel (som 98 +%) eier egnede våpen. Selv om det allerede er ulovlig for forbrytere å eie våpen, føler jeg det er litt overivrig (slik at folk noen ganger ender opp med å miste sin rett til å holde og bære våpen for en "hvit krage" kriminalitet som for eksempel en falsk forsikring kort vs en " blue collar "kriminalitet som uberettiget drap). Sammen med dette, ville jeg armen hver lovlydige stand bodied person mulig, noe som skal hindre eller i det minste kutte ned på sjansene for strøm sklir i gale hender ved å distribuere det.

Ønsker du å støtte selvforsvar og rett til å holde og bære våpen? Annet enn å kontakte politikere, besøker rett til å holde og bære våpen rally, det å like eller følge sosiale medier sider dedikert til dette, og så videre, det er mange grupper du kan støtte.
Non USA basert;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
United States of America basert;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Regional USA basert;,,,,,,,

Brauchen wir mehr Waffenkontrolle? Wenn Sie denken, so lesen Sie bitte.

Hinweis: Ich entschuldige mich im Voraus für alle schlechte Übersetzungen. Ich habe Google translate auf ein ursprünglich englischen Artikels, zu übersetzen und damit könnten die Dinge nicht sehr glatt.

"- Der ultimative Kritik der Gun Control Der eigentliche Zweck der 2. Änderung" Die meisten der folgenden wird meine Umschreibung anhand von zwei Videos, aufgerufen werden & "Das göttliche Recht der Selbstverteidigung - Mike Adams Dokumentarfilm". Teil eins wird meist aus "Der eigentliche Zweck der 2. Änderung - The Ultimate Kritik der Gun Control" sein, während Teil 2 ist mehr "das göttliche Recht der Selbstverteidigung - Mike Adams Dokumentarfilm" basiert. Teil drei wird von meiner eigenen Schöpfung. Alles ist von meiner Meinung nach. Keineswegs ist dieser Artikel soll den Blick auf jede andere Person oder Gruppe zu vertreten.

Teil eins: Viele Leute stimmen zu, dass wir alle haben unveräußerliche oder göttlichen Rechte, die Rechte, die nicht genommen werden sollten, sind. Nur um ein paar zu nennen, viele einig, dass wir alle sollten das Recht auf sauberes Wasser, gutes Essen, friedlich zu versammeln Zugriff haben, zu sprechen, ohne Angst, die Praxis der Religion (solange andere nicht beeinträchtigt) (und, zumindest für einige der Sie, vielleicht sogar dazu beigetragen, oder gesorgt, wenn nötig werden). Aber es gibt ein Recht, das wir vergessen oft; das Recht auf Verteidigung selbst und andere. Das Merkwürdige an Rechte, das heißt, sie sind tatsächlich Grenzen. Redefreiheit, zum Beispiel kann es nicht geben, es sei denn Grenzen eingerichtet, um die Machthaber zu schaden oder zu inhaftieren, die gegen sie sprechen, zu verhindern. Aber wer ist letztendlich für die Einhaltung dieser Grenzen verantwortlich? Sie können glauben, müssen Sie die haben recht. Aber was passiert, um diese Rechte, wenn eine Gruppe bewaffneter Männer beginnen von Gebäude zu Gebäude bewegen, nach Hause, nach Hause zu verletzen, zu töten und / oder Entführung diejenigen, die mit ihnen nicht einverstanden sind.
Das genaue Szenario Immer wieder entfaltete im Laufe der Geschichte.
Er wiederholt immer wieder, nicht wirklich, weil die Geschichte in Vergessenheit geraten, sondern es war nicht richtig verstanden worden. Was ist, wenn die Menschen, die Opfer von der exakt gleichen Szenario hatte eine Chance?
Sie glauben, dass die Regierung sollte die Gewaltmonopol haben. Aber in Wirklichkeit, die Bande von bewaffneten Männern, die ich beschrieben, ist oft der Regierung.
Es waren die Regierungen der Welt, die für den Völkermord, ethnischen Säuberungen, und Massenmord an Zivilisten verantwortlich waren. Es waren die Regierungen, die politischen und religiösen Dissidenten ausgerottet. Es war die Regierungen, die die Konzentrationslager und geheime Gefängnisse gebaut. Es waren die Regierungen, die die schlimmsten Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit begangen. Die Regierungen haben sich als die korruptesten, rücksichtslosesten Organisationen auf dem Planeten sein. Auch all die schlimmsten Massen Shooter kombiniert werden können, nicht einmal nahe kommen, um das Ausmaß der Schäden überwältigt Regierungen verursacht.

 Wenn die Leute haben keine Mittel der Verteidigung, die Regierung hat keine wirklichen Grenzen. Wir können nicht einfach hoffen, dass ihre Untergebenen (oft militärische und Strafverfolgung, die zu gehorchen) nicht zu gehorchen. Das lässt nur der Prozess, um wieder von vorn anfangen. Sie können glauben, dass die Regierung kann frei von Korruption sein, aber in der Realität, Machtpositionen zieht Tyrannen, Schläger & Psychopathen wie Gülle zieht Fliegen. Es hat immer und immer. Regierung zieht diese Art von Individuen wegen der Macht über andere. Und für das Sahnehäubchen auf dem Kuchen, bekommen sie einen Gehaltsscheck! Was kann eine solche Person möglicherweise mehr verlangen?

 Sobald die Arten von Menschen beschrieben, erhalten in, wen würden Sie sich zu drehen? Sie können nicht in Sicherheit zu bringen, indem sie mehr von deiner Macht und Rechte weg an jemand anderen. Die Wurzel des Problems ist eine totale Gewaltmonopol. Die Lösung ist, NO MONOPOLE ZEITRAUM geben. Wir als Menschen sind einfach nicht reif genug, um mit dieser Art von Versuchung umzugehen. Wahre Macht Gleichgewicht muss erhalten bleiben. Das Recht auf Selbstverteidigung ist, dass Gegengewicht. Es ist die Grenze, die wirklich macht andere Rechte möglich. Wir sind letztlich diejenigen für uns selbst und gegenseitig Schutz verantwortlich. Allerdings ist das Recht auf Verteidigung sinnlos ohne die Mittel der Verteidigung (wie eine schwer bewaffnete Bevölkerung). Aus diesem Grund glaube ich, das Recht auf Verteidigung von sich selbst und anderen ist ein Kernrecht von Tieren, einschließlich Menschen, unabhängig von ihrer Rasse, Religion, sexueller Orientierung, der ethnischen Zugehörigkeit, der sexuellen Identität, nationaler Herkunft, Hautfarbe und / oder andere Merkmale.

(Beachten Sie, das Video wird in "Gun Control ist Völkermord", so)
Teil zwei.

 Menschen, die rational, nüchtern denk sind und folgen Sie den Code der Ethik und Moral weder suchen noch erstellen Gewalt & deeskalieren es bei jeder Gelegenheit. Dieser sollte, wie alle Menschen zu arbeiten, vor allem diejenigen, die bewaffnet sind. Vielleicht die besten Leute, die wir finden können, sind diejenigen, die Gewalt zu verachten, aber bereit sind, sie auf heftigen Raubtiere zu entfesseln, wenn sie keinen anderen Weg, um den Räuber (n) stoppen. Das Recht, die Verteidigung der Selbst & andere sollten nicht selektiv Recht für einige Leute, wie Polizeibeamte und Angehörige der Streitkräfte, während selektiv falsch für andere, wie durchschnittliche Leute, die nicht Gewalt begehen können. Gerade dabei aus meiner Sicht, Vollzugsbeamte und Militärs sind Bürger gewährten Genehmigung und zusätzliche (aber nicht unbegrenzt) Macht durch die wir, die durchschnittliche Menschen. Strafverfolgungsbehörden sollten direkt zum Schutz unserer Gemeinden, während der Militär stellt eine externe Verteidigung, nur um direkt in den Gemeinden, wenn absolut notwendig (in Situationen wie Katastrophen, Invasionen, große Unruhen oder Krisen in dieser Weise) eingesetzt werden. Private Sicherheits sollten Privateigentums & Cover zu schützen, wenn der Strafverfolgung ist nicht verfügbar. Fugitive Recovery / bail Durchsetzung Agenten (Kopfgeldjäger) sollten Kriminelle jagen.
Eine Menge Leute würden zustimmen, dass es richtig ist, um Schmerzen, Verletzungen oder sogar den Tod zu einem heftigen Psychopath, der bereits mehrere Menschen getötet hatte, und beabsichtigt zu töten mehr verursachen. Aber eine Frage, die einige verwirrt ist und nicht oder nicht es richtig, es Menschen zu tun, sondern sie normale Menschen, oder ein Vollzugsbeamten oder Militärpersonal sein soll. Während dies beängstigend klingen und ist umstritten, ja, es ist das Richtige zu tun, und nicht oder nicht jemand trägt eine Uniform. Polizeibeamte und Angehörige der Streitkräfte sind immer noch Menschen. Sie, wie ziemlich viele Menschen sind nicht perfekt, und kann immer noch schlecht gehen, so wie jede andere Person.

 Um runde Teil zwei oben, & Wissenschaft Personen mögen diesen Teil, wie in "The Divine Right of Self Defense - Mike Adams Dokumentarfilm" erklärt, viele Pflanzen und Tiere üben ihr Recht auf Selbstverteidigung. Kakteen, zum Beispiel, haben scharfen Dornen, die Tiere zu lehren, weg zu bleiben. Ebenso haben porcupines Stacheln, die das gleiche tun. Ein Vogel, der einen Fernabwehrmechanismus verwendet, ist der südliche Grau Petrel, die eine Magen, Wachsester und Triglyceride, die sein können, Projektil auf Räuber erbrachen produziert hatte. Einige Vogelspinnen, was heißt "Brennhaare / Borsten", die in die Luft auf ein Ziel mit ihren Hinterbeinen schnippte werden kann. Diese Haare können zu reizen, und könnte sogar tödlich für kleine Tiere. Viele Insektenarten haben chemische Waffen zur Verfügung. Die Bombardier-Käfer, verwendet beispielsweise thermische chemische Reaktionen zu einer siedenden, schädliche chemische Spray in schnelle Impulse von speziellen Drüsen in ihrem Unterleib zu starten. Einige Ameisen (insbesondere Holz Ameisen) können Säure sprühen. Einige Geckos können eine schwarze oder hell klebrige Flüssigkeit aus Drüsen in ihrem Schwanz für Entfernungen bis zu etwa einen Meter mit guten Ziel schießen. Die Spitting Cobra können Gift aus nach vorne gerichteten Löcher in ihren Fängen, spuckt bis zu 1,5 m zu sprühen. Die Kalifornien-Grundeichhörnchen ist bekannt, dass Raubtiere kämpfen wie Schlangen durch Treten Schmutz in die Augen. Elefanten sind dafür bekannt, verschiedene Gegenstände zu werfen.
Einige Primaten, einschließlich Menschen, sind dafür bekannt, verschiedene Gegenstände zu werfen. Und als Bonus, werde ich erwähnen, dass Schildkröten, zusammen mit Meeresfrüchten, haben Schutzschalen, die Tierkörperpanzer ist, wenn man so will. Natur äquivalent zu heutigen kugelsichere Westen.
Warum ist das wichtig? Viele Politiker sagen, dass sie wollen, dass die menschliche Spezies zu entwaffnen. Obwohl nicht nur ist dies in sich selbst ist eine Verletzung eines göttlichen Recht, sondern auch, ist es nicht möglich, jeden letzten menschlichen vollständig zu entwaffnen auf dem Planeten. Um die Menschen zu entwaffnen, müssen die Leute, die die Entwaffnung gewappnet zu sein, und so wird es immer wie Macht Umverteilung als Abrüstung.

Teil drei.
Sie glauben also, dass eine Demokratie (oder Republik) immer sterile von Korruption sein? Die Demokratie ist so steril von Korruption religiösen heiligen Bücher sind von Gewalt. Obwohl dies auch klingen mag klischeehaft, ich habe dieses Argument in der Umgebung geändert wird, schauen wir uns an Nazi-Deutschland. Die Weimarer Republik war in einer schlechten Situation aus dem Ende des Ersten Weltkrieges bis zum Beginn der Nazi-Deutschland. Dann kam Adolf Hitler auf, versprach den Menschen eine Menge gute Sachen kommen würde, wenn er an der Macht war. Und rate mal? Er Gans sein eigenes Volk in eine Geschichte des Blutvergießens trat. Er entwaffnet alle außer für die so genannten "Herrenrasse", die es einfacher, Juden, Homosexuelle, Sinti und Roma, politische Gegner und mehr zu töten gemacht. Adolf Hitler kam von der rechten Seite. Josef Stalin kam von der linken Seite. Doch beide waren dazu in der Lage genau dasselbe.

Manche Leute machen das Argument, dass die Waffen durch Zivilpersonen besaßen wenig bis gar keine Übereinstimmung zu den von der Regierung besaß. Doch nicht nur viele der Personen, die dieses Argument verwenden wenig bis gar keine Strafverfolgung oder militärische Erfahrung haben, und haben oft nicht viel Wissen, oder zumindest nicht tief denken, denken Sie an die Geschichte. Fragen Sie Menschen aus Vietnam, Nicaragua, Irak, Afghanistan und, nur um einige zu nennen. Guerilla aus diesen Nationen, zusammen mit verschiedenen kriminellen und Widerstandskämpfer gleichermaßen (oft aus Ländern der Dritten Welt) widerstanden oft besser ausgestattet Militärs, & gelungen. Sicher, in einigen Fällen taten sie bekommen Hilfe von externen Quellen (kommunistischen Block Regierungen geliefert kommunistischen Vietnam während des Vietnamkrieges, während die Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten geliefert anti kommunistisch Afghanistan), aber weder je weniger sie gewonnen. Außerdem können Anti Rüstung & Anti Flugzeuge Waffen aus staatlichen Waffenkammern und Militäreinheiten erfasst werden. Dinge wie Flugzeugen, gepanzerten Fahrzeugen und Artillerie werden oft für die Unterstützung gedacht und wird nicht garantieren, den Sieg. Ich will nicht leugnen, dass die Technologie wird ein Faktor sein, aber es ist definitiv nicht der einzige Faktor. Es ist nicht für militärische oder Polizeieinheiten leicht zu kämpfen, wenn sie wenig bis gar keine Fortschritte für ihre harte Arbeit zu gewinnen.

 Ich werde dies bis Wrap mit einigen Zitaten. Die meisten von guten Menschen, einen (Mao Zedong) aus einer der Bösen. Und ich weiß, dass Malcolm X. WAR rassistische gegen Weiße, obwohl schließlich änderte er seine Meinung.

 "In Bezug auf" Gewaltfreiheit "- es kriminell, den Leuten beizubringen, sich nicht selbst zu verteidigen, wenn sie die Opfer der ständigen brutalen Angriffe ist." "Ich weiß nicht einmal nennen es Gewalt, wenn es in der Selbstverteidigung, ich nenne es Intelligenz." "Non Violence ist in Ordnung, solange es funktioniert." "Wenn Sie einen Hund haben, muss ich einen Hund haben. Wenn Sie ein Gewehr haben, muss ich ein Gewehr zu haben. Wenn Sie einen Club haben, muss ich einen Club zu haben. Dies ist Gleichheit." - Malcolm X.

 "Freiheit ist nie freiwillig von dem Unterdrücker gegeben; muss sie durch den Unterdrückten eingefordert werden. "- Martin Luther King.

 "Legitime Gewaltanwendung kann nur die sein, die in der Selbstverteidigung erforderlich ist." - Ron Paul.

 "Die politische Macht kommt aus dem Lauf einer Waffe." - Mao Zedong.

PS: möchten Sie ihre Gemeinden zum Schutz vor Kriminalität und Gewalt halten wollen? Dann müssen wir andere Fragen, wie Wirtschaft, Verfügbarkeit der Dienste, Substanzgebrauch und die Bevölkerungsdichte, um nur einige zu nennen anzugehen. Es gibt Orte, mit einer Menge von Waffen, die nicht, dass Gewalt, wie Kennesaw, Georgia (was jeden Haushalt benötigt, um eine Feuerwaffe besitzen) und Spitzbergen, Norwegen, die jeder benötigt, zu wissen, wie man ein Gewehr gegen Eisbären zu verwenden. Beschränken leblose Gegenstände wie Waffen (es gibt viele Beispiele für hausgemachte Waffen und Munition) ist nicht genug, um die eigentliche Krankheit und nicht die Symptome anzugehen. Wenn es nach mir ginge auf Waffenkontrolle, kann ich die Hintergrundüberprüfung System (insbesondere die Aktualisierung von Informationen über Menschen) zu verbessern, und machen es illegal für einen gewalttätigen Täter, Waffen zu besitzen oder wissentlich Waffen zu übertragen, um gewalttätige Straftäter. Ich würde nur Registrierung ermöglichen, wenn ein sehr hoher Prozentsatz (wie 98 +%) besitzen geeignete Waffen. Obwohl es bereits illegal für Schwerverbrecher, Waffen zu besitzen, ich fühle es ist etwas übereifrig (so dass die Leute am Ende manchmal ihr Recht auf einen "white collar" Verbrechen wie, sagen wir zu halten und Waffen tragen, eine gefälschte Versicherungskarte vs verlieren ein " blue collar "Verbrechen wie ungerechtfertigte Tötung). Zusammen mit diesem, würde ich jedes Gesetz Arm treue tauglichen Personen möglich, die verhindern sollten oder zumindest nach unten auf die Chancen der Energie Abrutschen in die falschen Hände durch die Verteilung schneiden.

Wollen Sie Selbstverteidigung und das Recht zu halten und Waffen tragen unterstützen? Anders als in Kontakt Politiker, besuchen Recht zu halten und Waffen tragen Kundgebungen, Sympathie oder folgenden Social-Media-Seiten zu diesem und so weiter, gibt es viele Gruppen, die Sie unterstützen können.
Nicht Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika auf der Basis;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika basiert;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Regional Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika auf der Basis;,,,,,,,

Monday, October 19, 2015

Open message to fascists, neo-Nazis & white supremacists; how does your solution work?

(This is a mirror article of A few questions to (race & idealogical) supremacists; the feasibility & practicality of race supremacy, plus dealing with population decline))
(Got this credit of . And, while I won't all this guy a "madman" for reasons explained on , I'll call him evil.)

For some time, after cruising around on the internet and looking at the truth movement and subculture, I have started to see an interesting trend; I have seen whites in this movement and subculture, for whatever reason, turn to fascism, Nazism, and/or white supremacy. My theories for this is more than plain racism (and some jealousy), and involves things such as demographic change of caucasians over the past few years, a feeling that caucasians are losing (or have lost) too much power, crimes non-caucasians commit against caucasians, and I am sure that there are plenty of others. While I really want to do something about the New World Order and stopping something like the N.W.O. happening again, secure the futures of at-risk ethnic groups and so on and so forth, I personally don't agree with the route that fascists, neo-Nazis and white supremacists are taking, and thus why I am critiquing their plans.

I know that this article's target audience just have little to no care for races other than their own, and thus, I won't bother winning them over with morals/ethics, or even mentioning what if they were part of a race that they had to choice of being a part of whatsoever.

 One, tell me how on mother Earth does using an extreme ideology do anything to combat the current New World Order? I am not saying it can't, but aren't there alternatives to it? It is almost like putting a kid on antidepressants for things such as lack of concentration, possibly giving them health effects that they don't need (what they got is better) and perhaps not really looking into other solutions.

Two, why would you want a white supremacy world order? I have no problem with special "homelands" for people to go to if their group is being mistreated (though I prefer that these homelands behave themselves and don't take up too much space). Also, do you even hate big government? Or do you just dislike big government when it is not fully in your favour? I'm guessing it's the latter.

Three, did you know that you might be playing right into the hands of your own enemy (note that, while I don't agree with all of the author's views or the article's language, and I don't attack all Jews, you'll get the idea)?

By the way, I perfectly agree with StormCloudsGathering when he said "Ok in regards to my last post. Someone objected when I mocked "white pride" (because that's somehow better than "white power"). Alright you asked for it. If you are proud of the color of skin you happen to have been born with (regardless of which color that skin is), that is a sign of a shrunken and pathetic intellect. 
My skin is white. I'm not ashamed of that, but it has no bearing on my merit or on anyone else's for that matter. I don't pick my friends based on melanin content. If you do, then get off of my page."

Usually, I don't publically complain about racial/ethnic pride, but I personally despite taking pride in something that you cannot change.
(Got this from

I don't expect to convert many people. But at least I'm not cussing or being ruthless about it, maybe like I should when dealing with these characters.

Here's a comment from StormCloudsGathering from the video above: "Of course other races can be racist. I've experienced it personally from hispanics and blacks when I was a kid (some of the schools I went to were in what most would call the ghetto). This video addresses the racist in OUR AUDIENCE and we don't have a problem with rampant black supremacists comments here on this channel, La Raza isn't harassing white people here but we do on the other hand have a massive number of what can only be called neo-nazis spreading their propaganda in the comments."

So, I am willing to bet you are asking "How else are we going to fight the New World Order"? Well, look it up yourself. But definitely look at Revolution: An Instruction Manual .

Saturday, October 17, 2015

Some new articles in the works

For those of you who wonder why posts are often weeks in between, well, I am a student. Right now, my, um, teachers are loading me down with homework and I am quite poor to terrible at time management. Combined with the way I come up with ways to write articles, the amount of time between posted articles is HUGE. But, I'll list most examples that are coming soon, somewhat in order.

Loose cannons: Alex Jones, NRA, Ted Nugent, CAIR & Louis Farrakhan (Done)
How truth people are indirectly connected, starring Ron Paul. (Done)
Open message to Fascists, Neo-Nazis & White supremacists; how does your solution work? (Done)
Open message to the world's people; stop having so many kids! ADOPT instead!
Open message to Jewish Zionists: so you think you could get away with the N.W.O.?
Calling out Ted Nugent: Clean up your act or be quiet!
Please, no politics; the politicisation of originally non-political internet videos & articles (Done)
Pro's & Con's of diversity. And accepting people as long as they respect the rights of others.
What do you think are the best DA/SA hammer fired pistols?

Be sure to check back every couple of weeks or so for new articles.

Want to support me? Link to my blog and social media profiles. Promote my articles on this blog, my Pins on Pinterest and follow my social media profiles. Thanks for reading. Peace!

Do you like my "Read if you're making assumptions about me" post?

Google+ Badge