Follow by Email


Sunday, February 28, 2016

Mainstream & issues are rediculous

As explained above, the mainstream media does not talk about truly important issues (except for gun control), and as a result, many Americans do not think or talk about the real issues.

Now, non-religious American voters have it bad already, and I've seen almost all. However, I haven't truly seen it all yet until I started to look for Ron Paul's approval ratings and I've cam across was astounded at how they depicted Paul. 
I did some more searching into the site, and looked the "Beliefs", and "Platform" sections, and let's just say that just looking through those pages was mortifying for me.

As of Paul's foreign policy, I hate China's government too. With Russia, I am concerned about their influence in the world (lookup on how Russia may set up its own New World Order).
For Islam, actually, it's nowhere near the threat that many think it is, and would die even quicker if some of the activity propping up more radical sectors are removed.

The other issues are not only relatively insignificant from a secular standpoint, but also, I'd like to add that it is a violation of natural rights to force prayer or religious study or to limit speech except in extreme cases (ie non-educational videos depicting real abuse). Anyone who has done real research about internet pornography doesn't have such one-sided views on the issue, and would probably see the way its presented on the site as bogus.
I'd also like to mention that the "Under god" part was added way after the revolution, and you can read up on how the founding fathers were pro-secularism, and some even voice not-so-religious views (
Though the "Under god" issue definitely is going to the the last one I'll get into becuase it is so small in comparison to the others.

The main problem that I have with these types of people is not their views; it is them wanting to use the force of the state to impose their views and way of life onto others.

I follow more of what Ron Paul's true believes becuase of his voting history, involvement in the truth movement and overall intelligence.

I should've seen this all coming; the stereotypical views of an American Christian Conservative. In reality, their attention to important issues (or lack thereof) is usually not all that different from their Atheist Liberal counterpart; often, they pick sides and people like a sports team and celebrity event.

We can go to all of the websites mentioned in the long version of this article's title, search up the issues mentioned in the videos above, and they have little to no talk about these issues. Other than foreign policy (at least sort've), the only important issue that they would actually talk about is gun control.

Now, what can we do about this? First, hunt down the email addresses of people running sites like the ones mentioned above, take aim, and shoot them with a link to this article (I do not like real-life violence).

Also, show people my playlist, "Revolution: An Instruction Manual", and share posts like

Thank you for reading this article. Please subscribe to my YouTube channel ( and support the channels I support, follow me on Pinterest (, Google+ (, support me and Ryan Dawson on Tsu (

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

February 20th South Carolina Republican primary results response

This is a little late, but the results this time maybe wasn't so disappointing; Trump came in 1st, and Cruz came in 2nd.

While Donald Trump is NOT against supporting parasite governments, the NDAA, Patriot Act, Bailouts, the Federal Reserve, or even the drug war, I've heard that he is against other wars (from what I've heard), will take action against Obamacare, doesn't take money from anyone else (from what I've heard), opposes NAFTA, is willing to work with Assad to combat ISIS (not that I like Assad) and of course, he opposes strict weapon laws (though I'm worried that he may oppose weapon laws selectively, as that he doesn't like Muslims very much. I don't know him personally, so I am not entirely sure if he just wants to restrict Muslim travel beyond necessity and put other restrictions on all of them without a fair, speedy trial for individuals or run a holocaust-style campaign of genocide).

For better information, look at my post about Iowa's February 2nd, 2016 caucus results.

Monday, February 15, 2016

Trivia post: idea for new Star Wars TROOPS episode, why stormtroopers miss so much, plus Ikrit the "cat" Jedi & more

I'm sure that many of you already watched the "TROOPS" parody of the real-life TV show "COPS". While looking in the comments of a video called "Star Wars: The Clone Wars - Anakin chases Ahsoka Tano in tunnels [1080p]", I came across this one, which inspired me to think about a TROOPS episode for Coruscant-based shock troopers for the events depicted in "Star Wars: The Clone Wars, Season 5, Episode 18: To Catch a Jedi".

In this case, I would like to see the shock troopers doing what they do, and have the event of chasing Ahsoka Tano be depicted from the point of view of the troopers plus the fugitive's master himself (Anakin Skywalker). After their brief fight with Ahsoka and Asajj (, they get a quick breifing in the gunship, (and for comedic relief/comic relif,) are shown some other pictures of Ahsoka to get her appearance better set in their minds, and it just happens that those pictures not only include the season 1, 2 and 3 1/2 Ahsoka (yes, I admit, I liked the older appearance better, not that I have any problems with the newer appearance,), but also, some pictures that, let's just say, Anakin or Ahsoka wouldn't be particularly enthusiastic about the entire universe seeing those (a reference to what happened in Meet the Spy).

By the way, if I was in either Ahsoka's or Asajj's place, I would've picked up at least 1 blaster to both give me a ranged and less-than-lethal (with "stun" setting) option.
I'm also surprised that none of the troopers managed to shoot either Ahsoka or Asajj, especially with their fingers on the trigger the whole time (which is terribly unprofessional, irresponsible and outright dangerous, and is also demonstrated in many movies, tv shows, videogames, etc). The only logical reason that I can come up with is that the troopers didn't want to shoot any of their teammates in such close range and that chaotic of a situation. Even though they probably wouldn't die (assuming that their blasters are set to "stun" and none of their assailants attempt for do further harm to any of the troopers), it is not good to have a teammate knocked out of action.

I have more criques like the one above in "A few parallels between Star Wars & the New World Order, how Barriss stayed in the Jedi order, & more", and "Trivia post: Star Wars: is Anakin Skywalker good or evil, Anakin's Clones & Rise of the droids & how Shaak Ti could've defeated Grievous".

Why do stormtroopers miss so much?

I'm sure that most, if not all, of you know the Stormtrooper's reputation for being poor shots. There are many theories on why this happens, but I believe that the top 4 causes are armor design, training, morale and motivation.

As said on Stormtroopers vs Clone Troopers (Phase 1) and How Powerful Was The Galactic Empire?, stormtrooper training was sometimes rushed for human recruits, and while it wasn't as intense as clone troopers, the harshness of the training and being motivated with fear in turn undermined the morale of stormtroopers, and made them surprisingly incompetent when dealing with organized enemies such as the rebel alliance. When it comes to armor design, as shown on Why stormtroopers miss, it is a combination of both the helmet and body armor.

When it comes to the helmet, the wearer's field of view is extremely limited. I personally know a cop who went through simunitions (look it up if you're curious) training, and he had to wear a big helmet that only lets the wearer see straight forward with little to no peripheral vision. When it comes to the body armor, it is hard to properly shoulder a long gun (this may be partially corrected with an adjustable stock, but I am not sure if it can be fully corrected unless the stock was of the right length and had a rubber buttplate to reduce slipping), and thus, hard to properly aim.


My comment on "Who is Ikrit (The Cat Jedi)?".
No offense to Ikrit, his creators or fans, but I think that he looks like a fairy-tail character, not that I have any problem with him.

By the way, believe it or not, his species, the Kushiban, are lagomorphs, making them more related to rabbits or hares than to felines, such as cats.

What I would've done if I was an average Galactic Empire citizen.
I probably would've kept it with me, and possibly carry it if I can (if I can't or decide not to, I would keep it in storage for safekeeping). If possible, I would arrange for it to be donated to a rebel (a force-sensitive if possible) that can use it after I die (hopefully it could be recovered). Since it is a prohibited weapon that can be possessed under very narrow circumstances (ie working for the Imperial government), I would probably just as careful, if not, more careful than possessing a weapon in a country where the weapon is prohibited (ie operational machine guns in many developed and some developing countries).

Ideas for Utopia Federation action figure sets for "My Own Creation" modeling and stop-motion movie making.

Since I have yet to see good Hasbro-pattern action figures to represent the Utopia Federation (U.F.) forces, so I have ideas for substitutes and reasoning behind those ideas, especially since, as far as I know, Terminator action figures may not be the right scape compared to Hasbro pattern ones.

My idea for the substitute base model U.F. humanoid trooper would be an Old Republic Trooper repainted and re accessorized (let's pretend that their armor is a less-expensive variation of Clone Commando armor), with their main weapons being E-11 (standard issue) and DC-15 (designated marksmen/sniper) rifle copies, with heavy blaster pistols (mainly DL-44 variants) being issued as sidearms, rocket launchers and Z-6 rotary blasters for fire support and heavy fighting. Their primary vehicles would the the AT-AT, AT-TE, LAAT/i, STAP-1, and various speeder bikes.

For mechanical (droid) forces, they are pretty much copy-cats from the separatists; commando droids, magnaguards, Q-series droidekas, Homing spider droids, Dwarf spider droids, Crab droids, Hailfire droids, T-series tactical droids, B2-HAR super battle droids (R stands for "rocket", as that, via back mounted rockets, can fly like the Jump Droid and B2-RP Rocket droid) and sniper droidekas (this last one would be custom made). The main non-separatist droid would be the IG-82 sentinel/assassin droid.

The main infantry droids in use would be Magnaguards, B2-HAR, and to a shorter extent, IG-82's and Commando droids were used as regular infantry droids (Magnaguards were used for being good and robust warriors. B2-HAR's were used for their ability to both fly and launch homing torpedo's. IG-82's and Commando droids were more agile. IG-82's can see around them, while Commando droids can lead well.).

The main pilot droids were IG-82's, Commando droids and T-series tactical droids.
Sniper droidekas were mainly deployed as, of course, snipers, and defensive and support droids. Q-series droidekas were also used for both defense and support.

All others, being Crab, Hailfire, Homing spider and Dwarf spider droids were used in other battle roles.

The explanation for these substitutes was that they were part of the military reserve force, and thus, didn't get as much premium equipment. The government and military also refused to fund research and development for more advanced droids for financial reasons, so the military had private companies contract copies of already existing technology, including droids.

Thank you for reading this article. Please follow me on Pinterest (, Google+ (, subscribe to my YouTube channel (, support me and Ryan Dawson on Tsu ( and please support the channels I support.

Saturday, February 13, 2016

Should we support Israel? If so, why or why not? And the truth about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict exposed.

NOTE: BEFORE YOU REPLY, READ THE ENTIRE DOGGONE ARTICLE. I DO NOT ENDORSE ALL OF THE POLITICAL OPINIONS OR BACKGROUNDS OF THE PEOPLE WHO I USE AS SOURCES, AND I DO NOT SUPPORT HIM OUTSIDE OF THE SPREADING OF INFORMATION (in fact, QUESTION everything they say, especially when it comes to things such as immigration). ANY STUPID COMMENTS (OR EVEN COMMENTS WITH POOR GRAMMAR) WILL BE DELETED. POST ENOUGH DUMB COMMENTS AND I WILL SHUT DOWN THE COMMENTS SECTION. ALSO, I DO NOT HATE ALL JEWISH PEOPLE, FOR REASONS EXPLAINED ON , , ,, , & . And NO, I am NOT an Arab, or Muslim, & I don't call myself liberal). I also am not against Israel's existence, just their CURRENT GOVERNMENT. For more info, look up terms like “Palestinian Christians”, “Anti-Zionist Jews” & “Zionist Muslims”. Posting anti-Jewish comments (or racist comments for that matter) will get you blocked.
Heck, I even support certain Jewish groups, such as Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (, Orthodox Jews united against Zionism (, True Torah Jews (, Jews against Islamophobia (, & even Jews against circumcision ( 

If you can't see the videos, look at the 1st 25 videos in this playlist (the 2nd one is not required): .

Why should you pull your support for the Israeli government? As explained in the videos below
(also be sure to watch the next 2 after the one above),

This is before you factor in how people in Israel treat people who are not BOTH Jewish AND Zionist ( ), & seem to actually ENJOY the killing of Palestinians ( Before you make the argument that, to the Israelis,  it would've been a “relief” to get revenge on people that they have been fighting with for a long time, just remember that 2 wrongs (particularly with collective punishment) does not make a right.
Before you self proclaimed Christians out there say that the Jews are the “chosen people” (again, I am NOT attacking them), you better think again. This is the same book that allows cutting open pregnant women's stomachs plus bashing babies on rocks (Isaiah 13:15-18 I believe), ALLOWS slavery (Leviticus 25:44), KILLING KIDS for cursing at their parents (Leviticus 20:9), doesn't let women to teach or have authority over a man (2:12) just to get started. Also, if you really follow the Bible, you better forget about wearing mixed fabrics (Leviticus 19:19), getting tattoos (Leviticus 19:28), eating pork (Leviticus 19:27), eating shellfish (Leviticus 11:10-12), trimming hair on temples or beards (Leviticus 19:27), or having fortune tellers, fortune cookies or horoscopes (Leviticus 19:31). For some extra proof, watch a video called "Why there's no bible on my bookshelf". Besides, books such as the Bible is ultra hard to understand, & I guarantee you that god would've made the Bible a lot easier to understand if he really wrote it.
Also, look at Torah verses Deuteronomy 20 :16-18 , & Deuteronomy 20:10-15 to get started. And go read read , ,
Also, look at the playlist below.
Do you agree with this message? Spread it! Please #spamshare & #friendbomb for #palestine ! Share it with every supporter of Israel you know. Share this on Christian, Conservative & Israel-supporting websites, posts, forums & online communities. And don't forget to copy and save this via things like YouTube playlists, clouds (such as Google drive), & save this on your computer for safekeeping & passing the message to the rest of humanity. And support websites such as,,,,,,, & And be definitely be sure to donate to Ryan Dawson's anti-AIPAC trip (finish it by May the 7th);

I have a question for religious supporters of Israel: So if whoever governs the land does something bad you'll still support them? I have a quick question which I like to call the "Crazy, extreme 2 candidates dilemma" type of question. Here's the situation: everyone is forced to vote. People who don't vote would be caught & taken by the secret thought police to be forced to vote at gunpoint, with NO EXCEPTIONS WHATSOEVER.

Candidate A, Jesus of Nazareth Christ, premises to end the New world Order, the spying on average people (particularly acts like the NDAA, SOPA, CISPA & the "Patriot" act just to name a few), take chemicals (like fluoride) out of the water supply, repeal all weapon laws (on civilians without violent felonies) & more just to name a few. 

But, to fight the New World Order, the current Israeli government would get demolished and Israel may get a new one (but it would take time). 
Candidate B, Satan Devil, openly supports the New World Order, weapon laws on law abiding civilians, & threatens to send ANYONE AND EVERYONE who even gives the slightest clue of of questioning Candidate B would be sent to an indoctrination camp for re-brainwashing. Those who can't be brainwashed will be sent to a top secret concentration camp (actually, more like slaughterhouse) & never be heard from again. Candidate B fully supports Israeli government, to the extent that it will receive literally ALL the money it can possibly want, with free military support (as in the military would do everything for the Israeli government, including doing things from deporting Palestinians to antarctica to waging a crusade against those goatf***ing rag headed satanic-pedophile worshiping sand monkeys). When you're at the booth, who would you check? Candidate A or B? You can guess who I'll vote for. Who would you vote for? And you can't skip the vote. If you do, the Secret Thought Police would get you & force to to vote at gunpoint.

Thank you for reading this article. Please subscribe to my YouTube channel ( and support the channels I support, follow me on Pinterest (, Google+ (, support me and Ryan Dawson on Tsu (

Ideas wanted for "Pro's & Con's of diversity & accepting people as long as they respect the rights of others".

I've been brainstorming this article since August of 2015. I had quite a few ideas, but I did not feel like that I had ones good enough to put on paper. You might've read some of my philosophical work, such as "Philosophy & social issues rant: Savage vs Civilized dichotomy, oversimplification, gray areas, collectivism & hypocrisy", "Philosophy, morals & ethics: Best Interests vs Greater Good, which life code would you accept & what is patriotism", "The broken/convoluted uses & definitions of "racist"" and maybe even "My personal rant".

What I want is a perfectly or at least reasonably well balanced and minimally biased philosophical piece (Maybe like Alan Watts) that, of course, talks about the advantages and disadvantages of the many different lifestyles that people around the world have, and the natural features and differences within races of the same species.

Well, I'd like to get some ideas to help create this. If you have any ideas, please leave them in the comments (having an internet account is NOT required to comment. For the sake of convenience, I do not even use CAPTCHA). Thanks. Peace!

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

February 10th, 2016 New Hampshire primary response

I've heard of today's primary, and I am disappointed in this one more than Iowa's February the 2nd caucus. Now, Donald Trump was in 1st place, while John Kasich came in 2nd. I never really heard of the latter.

While Kasich's social views just might not be as bad as Trump's, he's pro-NAFTA, you should look up his views on the Patriot act, supports bank bailouts, has not-so-clean-cut views on gun control, doesn't oppose aid to parasite governments (as usual), you should lookup his views on war, doesn't oppose the war on drugs, and, at the time this article was posted, it is not known what his stance on the Federal reserve is. Also make sure to go look at campaign donors.

I'm also bothered that Hillary also came out over Bernie Sanders again.

For more information, visit the link above that's about Iowa's caucus that was held on February the 2nd. I won't bother repeating information here.

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Quick announcement: Ryan Dawson subscribtions & growth

Woo Hoo! My favorite truth person, Ryan Dawson, just got 21,000+ subscribers today! Hopefully, other truth people will also become more popular as time goes on!

By the way, please help fund Ryan Dawson's anti-AIPAC trip; Why we should NOT support the Israeli government (never mind the name):

Sunday, February 7, 2016

Trivia post: Star Wars: is Anakin Skywalker good or evil, Anakin's Clones & Rise of the droids & how Shaak Ti could've defeated Grievous

(Note to regular readers of this blog; I'm sorry that I don't do posts on politics, social issues or philosophy as much as I should. Simply put, I am not always sure how to properly present certain social issues or philosophical things to the public, and I also have time constraints with school, homework, projects, family, and so on. So, I'll be doing trivia posts like this one, which at least would gain more views for this blog. And maybe I can recruit more people into the truth movement, thus potentially educating more by giving good information, showing how to solve problems and breal real change and also promoting good truth people. I assure you that this will be NOT a dedicated Star Wars blog; there is a reason why I put the words "Trivia post" on the begining of articles like this one. I post links to this article mainly on Star Wars communities on Google+.)

To Star Wars fans: please read "A few parallels between Star Wars & the New World Order, how Barriss stayed in the Jedi order, & more".

Is Anakin Skywalker good or evil?

We all know that Anakin Skywalker had his moral-ethical ups and downs. We all all know that, in the last few minutes of his life (as Darth Vader), he was redeemed from the dark side of the force and brought back to the light side, which at least hints that he is a good person at heart (not that I believe that everyone is good at heart, but that everyone has the potential to be good or evil). Though I want to dig a little deeper.
As you can read on "Anakin Skywalker - Personality and traits", Anakin was described as "though lovable, he also was one to carry grudges and was vengeful, but he commonly held these two traits in check", and "Due to his sudden escalation from slave to being known as the "Chosen One" and the rising star of the Jedi Order, pride and arrogance set in. He grew cocky, self-appreciating, and he grew to hate being reprimanded or lectured". 
In the same article, it was said that "Despite his actions, Vader apparently believed he was doing what was good for the galaxy" and "He expressed the belief that the Empire was the only way the galaxy could attain peace, justifying his actions and those of the Empire as necessary to accomplish this.", yet "He also appeared to have had a high sense of self-loathing as a result of his actions, so much so that he nearly committed suicide during his mission to Atoa." 
To wrap this up, in my conclusion (not that anyone else is obligated or expected to accept), Anakin was a good person at heart, even though he is quite manipulable, emotional, and some can even say somewhat immature.
I also recommend reading this article; The Psychology of Darth Vader Revealed.

By the way, I'm willing to bet that, if Ahsoka was found "Guilty" of the Jedi temple hangar bombing, Anakin might've violently lashed out in rage, and 1 of several things can happen, all after killing and injuring many people and doing other types of damage. 1, free Ahsoka and go into hiding. 2, fail to free Ahsoka and go into hiding. Or 3, go on a kill until killed killing spree, in which he kills and injures as many others and causes as much damage as he could to show his anger about what happened to Ahsoka. I thought of these becuase of his strong loyalty and how easy it is to anger him.

Also, if Anakin got a temper tantrum/hissy fit after Ahsoka declined to the Jedi council's invitation back into the Jedi order, it may look something like you see after 3:00 below when Benson from Regular Show tore up his apartment.

Now, here comes some fanon! Please bear with me and don't get butthurt over this.

Anakin's clones and rise of the droids.

I'm willing to bet that some of you might have read about the Kamino uprising ( and force-sensititve clones ( before. Now, I have my own idea for force sensitive clones, and the basis for a story about them.

This all started just after the end of the Clone Wars in the "Utopia federation" (which we'll abbreviate as the "U.F."), a group of outer-rim planets united under a single government and constitution. They all are very similar in that they are clean, paradise-like in a way similar to Naboo, have an almost limitless supply of resources, and a melting-pot culture, yet interestingly enough, have been largely ignored by major governments since the fall of the Old Republic.

Just after the clone wars, the U.F. decided to take a risk and take action against the Empire, believing that not only was it the right thing to do in the first place, but also, believed that the Empire's government and/or military would decide to attack it sooner or later anyway, justifying the use of force against the Empire.

First, the U.F. decided to not only create variants of the B-3 ultra battle droid, Droideka Mark 2, Super battle droid rocket trooper, Magnuaguard, Trade Federation F Series Battle Droid and various other droids and various vehicles, but also, to create the G-1 droid ("G" stood for "Guardian"), which were similar to the T-900 Terminator with a head similar to the T-888 Terminator, with the G-2 being like the T-1002 and T-XA Terminators combined, with the G-3 being the same as the T-X Terminator

However, the U.F. wasn't satisfied by an army mainly made up of its own citizenry and droids; they also wanted an army of force sensitives. Hence, the force-sensitive-clones project.
After all the DNA was gathered (either through donation or from captured DNA samples) and quick growth of the clone prototypes (who, after becoming grown enough, was given a pill to stop their aging), the main choices were;
Ki-Adi-Mundi combined with an unnamed Mirialan commando, who was picked for the former's brainpower and latter's flexibility,
Shaak Ti with a trace of Luminara Unduli, picked for an overall outstanding performance as a warrior plus the advantage of having the Togruta's unique montrals, which gave them a uniquely good awareness of what's going on around them with the flexibility of Mirialans, and
Anakin Skywalker, who was picked becuase of his high midi-chlorian count.

It was proposed to take the DNA of Mace Windu and clone him, since not only was he outstanding as a warrior, but also, was less emotional and manipulable than Anakin. However, Mace ended up not being cloned becuase Anakin's DNA was modified to be less emotional and manipulable than Anakin, and was also made to be more careful (especially when dealing with the dark side of the force). There were also plans to combine the DNA of Bossk and bounty hunter Bric to get the strength of the former with the intelligence of the latter, but it was canceled, mainly becuase of the extra work involved, and for icing on the cake, it was thought to be even weirder and wackier than organic species or genetically engineered clones in the galaxy.

All clones' DNA were modified to the DNA so that they would have increased lung capacity, improved stamina, a internal brain "switch" was added to block too many pain signals from coming to the brain, and thus, preventing impairment by pain, be well disciplined, and above all, strongly loyal to the U.F., and so on and so forth. Plus, they were also programmed with a fiery hatred of Emperor Palpatine and people like him (particulary those who are considered immoral/unethical).
Much of their weapons and equipment, particulary their armor (which was based off of Katarn-class clone commando armor) were similar to those worn by clone commando's. Instead of blasters, they carried Phaser type-3's for main rifles and Type 2 phasers as sidearms. The main lightsabers they wielded were based off of Asajj Ventress', or were similar to Ezra Bridger with the addition of being able to be attacked to make a saberstaff and being more refined, or double-bladed spinning lightsaber (like what inquisitors use)).

The color of their blaster bolts may be purple, which would penetrate and explode, and can also easily fry electronics, made by tip-top quality of tibanna gas that got ultra-refined and combined with an extremely high concentration of plasma.

When the prototypes were cloned and grown old enough to undergo trials, the production of Shaak Ti clones stopped becuase of inadequate protection of the montrals by a helmet design that disallowed them to function properly, along with high-sensitivity making the possessor vulnerable to objects hitting them. The latter problem was partially fixed when the "pain switch" was added. However, able-bodied survivors were allowed to continue their service, which they all eagerly did.

The Ki-Adi-Mundi and Mirialan commando hybrid was more common. Despite looking weird as a result of their head's shape and thus, their helmet's shape having an enormous "bump" n top of it, they were more common.

But, the one cloned above all was Anakin Skywalker, who was seen as the most powerful and thus, the most favorable of the clones.

However, these clones didn't have their flaws. Primarily, they were not always mentally real stable, even though they had no memories unlike force sensitive clones from other programs. The main cause of this particular problem was that the midi-chlorians didn't like having clones artificially be given midi-chlorians, and thus, undermined the sanity of the clones. For icing on the cake, they were not the type of crazy that the real-life Black Sheep squadron were.

As a result, force-sensitives clones were not produced in as large numbers as originally planned as that it was too hard to control an army with large numbers of unstable troops, and a mixture of G-series droids and non-force-sensitive clone hybrids were used instead.

And, partially as a result of the massive use of powerful droids against the Empire and many oppressive governments, and the voice of the droid rights movement, droid restraining bolts were heavily restricted, memory wipes were regulated, guidelines were set up for making anti-personality programs for droids, and overall, droids got better protection.

How Shaak Ti could've defeated General Grievous in Star Wars: Clone Wars: chapter 25.
I find it rather amazing how Shaak Ti could hold her own against dozens of Magnaguards for at least a few minutes, yet she faced Grievous head-on without utilizing proper tactics. I'm not a Jedi nor am I trained in using a lightsaber or even a sword, but if I was in Shaak Ti's place, I would've cut off 3 of Grievous' arms and then cut off his head. After getting that out of the way, I would've either stay put and do what I can to secure the area and fight off intruders or try to get away to a safer location.

I'd also like to add instances where a simple, easy move could've stopped something and possibly change the course of the story. An example is seen in "Star Wars: The Clone Wars - Season 04 Episode 12 Slaves Of The Republic", where Ahsoka held a lightsaber close to the queen, and apparently did not pay enough attention to what her assailant was doing with their hands. 

The situation that I'm talking about explains exactly why when, say, you're stopped by law enforcement, you are often told to put your hands where the officers dealing with you can see them, so you can't say, pull a weapon.

A similar situation is seen here. If I was in Ahsoka's place, I would've said to my assailant (in this case, the Queen) "Put your hands where I can see them. Don't do anything stupid". If my assailant reaches for something, if I don't have enough time to warn them or already warn them, I'll go ahead and cut their hand off, and the pain and shock should get me more compliance. After that, I would put my arm around the neck of the assailant with a lightsaber in front of it, and make my demands and do deals (in this case, being that me, my friends, and as many other people as possible are freed).
Fast forward to after the mission, I might get fussed at for the level of force that I use, kind've like what Jack Slater has to deal with with his boss, Lt. Dekker in the movie "Last Action Hero" ( Warning: strong language). I'll probably try to justify the use of force by saying something like "Do you want us to fail the mission, or any mission for that matter? We can't let the bad guys get away".

I feel like Ahsoka apparently doesn't always pay enough attention, becuase before she was zapped by the queen, she was zapped by Cad Bane. I wonder how detailed Jedi training is when it comes to doing practical things, such as watching what someone is doing with their hands.

Bonus: Ahsoka Tano and the wide audience of Star Wars.
I've came across this article, "Why Ahsoka Tano Is the Best Thing to Happen to Star Wars in 20 Years", which explains why Ahsoka was added into the Star Wars franchise. 
I've seen a bunch of haters of "The Clone Wars" movie and I've seen a few who weren't great fans of Ahsoka.

In my opinion, The Clone Wars movie and following series were a bit underrated. Namely, it originally had quite a young target audience, as reinforced by the merchandising and "Young readers" books.
I remember that, when I was younger, the series changed quite a bit in season 3, in terms of character appearance, story plots, and maybe even animation as well. Fast foward to know, especially after watching Why does General Grievous suck in The Clone Wars?, I've found out that mostly teens and young adults watched the show. Thus, that's why the story lines got deeper and darker, with maybe an exception for episodes from "A Necessary Bond" to "A Test of Strength", where younglings (kids) were featured a lot.

In a nutshell, I think both the movie, and to an extent, the series, were rather underrated. Mostly adults, at least sometimes with quite high expectations, were rating a movie and series for a young target audience, which explains why the movie and series got such a poor rating. So, they might not have been properly rated... from a certain point of view.

Now, with Star Wars rebels now out for over a couple of years as of the time this article was released, strangely, I didn't see as harsh or heavy criticism, even though it obviously is targeted for even younger audiences than The Clone Wars (and the animation screams the 2012 animated "Teenage Mutant Ninja turtles" series), and you'll probably be surprised at how many adults watch the series.

To wrap this up, I've seen a comment on the internet where someone said that, at first, they didn't watch The Clone Wars movie becuase they thought it was too cartoony. However, they saw it air on television, tried it, and liked it!

What are your thoughts of this? Any questions, concerns, or things I've missed? Please say so in the comments!

Thank you for reading this article. Please follow me on Pinterest (, Google+ (, subscribe to my YouTube channel (, support me and Ryan Dawson on Tsu ( and please support the channels I support.

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

February 2nd, 2016 Iowa caucus results response & micro ramble

I've heard the caucus results just today, and I'm disappointed: while Ted Cruz came 1st in the Republican primaries, I was disappointed that Rand Paul didn't came 2nd; that goes to Marco Rubio and Donald Trump. But, what bothered me even more was that HILLARY came out over SANDERS.

I have a hard time believing this. This just shows how incompetent the American people are at politics. Bernie Sanders is not good enough already... and Hillary is worse! When will the media focus on real issues and show us how to bring real change without depending on the system (truth people show us how, as seen in a link lower in this article)?

While Donald Trump is NOT against supporting parasite governments, the NDAA, Patriot Act, Bailouts, the Federal Reserve, or even the drug war, I've heard that he is against other wars (from what I've heard), will take action against Obamacare, doesn't take money from anyone else (from what I've heard), opposes NAFTA, is willing to work with Assad to combat ISIS (not that I like Assad) and of course, he opposes strict weapon laws (though I'm worried that he may oppose weapon laws selectively, as that he doesn't like Muslims very much. I don't know him personally, so I am not entirely sure if he just wants to restrict Muslim travel beyond necessity and put other restrictions on all of them without a fair, speedy trial for individuals or run a holocaust-style campaign of genocide).

If you're a fan of any of the winning candidates, look at the videos below.

MYTHBUSTERS: Debunking Bernie Sanders, Marco Rubio & More!
(Note: I do NOT agree with or endorse all of the social views of the creator of the above video, particularly for reasons explained on
Why You Should NOT Vote For Rand Paul In 2016

At least I'm glad that fundamentalist Mike Huckabee has dropped out.

Now, do you want REAL change? Look here:
We shouldn't depend on the system forever; we should try to get the least worst in, and ride this out until we're forced to bring real change, which is explained above.

Thank you for reading this article. Please follow me on Pinterest (, Google+ (, and subscribe to my YouTube channel (, and please support the channels I support.

Do you like my "Read if you're making assumptions about me" post?

Google+ Badge