I don't intend to say that there is no Russian propaganda or trolls going around, though I definitely will say that I'm not sure if reporting early on the truth about Benghazi (compare http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2012/11/04/the-mystery-behind-the-benghazi-attack/ to http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/11/07/benghazi-guards-turned-on-us-diplomats-in-2012-attack-sources-say.html ) is propoganda.
It seems like that all it takes for a site to be listed as "Russian propaganda" is to have any sort of support for Trump, which many of the sites that I know in the list have.
Back to PropOrNot, they think that BBC is credible:
Let alone AIPAC's or the CIA's influence on the mainstream media:
The above image is from https://web.archive.org/web/20020919110051/http://www.questionsquestions.net/gatekeepers.html.
WPost Won’t Retract McCarthyistic Smear,
Meet The Leftist Professor Who Wrote The 'Hit List' Of "Fake News" Sites,
PropOrNot: Evidence of a CIA Psychological Operation,
Glenn Greenwald Reveals How Pro-Clinton Trolls Originated Fake News Factory,
The CIA Never Ever Lies,
The War Against Alternative Information,
Forget Russia — The Real Threat to America comes from Israel and the Israel Lobby,
Hasbara: the way to justify racial apartheid and theft,
Fake News Versus No News .
And do you want some more alternate media sites? I've already done that!:
Don't like the mainstream media? Here's some alternate media sites that I would reccomend.